Writing section, identifying errors

  1. (Despite) the (lack of) eyewitness testimony, the prosecutor (found) the circumstantial evidence compelling enough to (charge Asher about) the robbery

answer is D, is it because it should have been charge Asher for???

  1. When asked (which) baseball team was my favorite, I (chose) the Yankees because (they) have the (more impressive) history

Answer is C, i guess it should have been it? But then what about the ‘have’ ?

  1. Yes, the phrase is to charge someone for a crime.
  2. Team names are plural, so changing "they" to "it" shouldn't be the solution.
  1. The idiom/collocation is "charge with" a crime.
  2. @bodangles is correct.

I thought the answer for 2 is D. Shouldn’t we say “the MOST impressive history”?

LOL, yeah, ignore me on number 1. It was past my bedtime. :stuck_out_tongue: Listen to marvin100; it’s “with.”

@AmericanGothic is correct on #2.

I would say:

  1. D (Idiomatic Error)
  2. D (Should be most since comparing more than two things)

When asked which baseball team was my favorite, I chose the Yankees because they had . . .

When asked which baseball team is my favorite, I choose the Yankees because they have . . .

This problem is stoopid.

Is this problem from the Blue Book, because the second one technically has 3 errors.

(Actually “more” could be fine for #2; since it doesn’t specify how many teams are being considered, there might only be two.)