Writing- What was wrong with my answer?

<p>Please help me reason why the correct answers are… correct. And if you will, please point out why my answers were wrong and what types of errors they belong to. The <em>__</em> means underlined in real test.</p>

<ol>
<li>No two of the specimens <em>was sufficiently alike to warrant them being called</em> members of a single species.</li>
</ol>

<p>My answer: was sufficiently alike to warrant their being called (wrong)
Correct: were sufficiently alike to warrant calling them</p>

<ol>
<li>Because the owl <em>is usually nocturnal</em> <em>plus being</em> virtually noiseless in flight, <em>it</em> <em>is seldom</em> seen by the casual observer. <em>No error</em></li>
</ol>

<p>My answer: No error
Correct answer: plus being</p>

<ol>
<li>An <em>economical and efficient</em> recycling center <em>is accessible</em> to the public, responsive to community needs, and <em>comply with</em> current federal regulations governing waste disposal. <em>No error</em></li>
</ol>

<p>My answer: economical and efficient
Correct answer: comply with</p>

<ol>
<li><em>As</em> we rely more and more on the Internet, <em>your</em> need for effective security planning and design <em>to safeguard</em> data <em>has increased</em>. <em>No error</em></li>
</ol>

<p>My answer: has increased
Correct answer: your</p>

<ol>
<li>The book <em>is essentially</em> a detailed and <em>very well document</em> record of what happened to <em>each of</em> the protestors. <em>No error</em></li>
</ol>

<p>My answer: is essentially
Correct answer: no error</p>

<ol>
<li><em>To understand</em> twentieth-century economic practices, <em>we must</em> be sufficiently <em>familiar with</em> Keynesian theories, whether one agrees <em>with them</em> or not. <em>No error</em></li>
</ol>

<p>My answer: no error
Correct answer: with them</p>

<p>Thanks a lot. :slight_smile: :slight_smile: :x</p>

<p>By the way, anyone knows how to write italic in CC? It is kinda messy to use *… :frowning: </p>

<p>1) Notice that the sentence is “no two of the specimens” which is plural. That means you would need were, since the sentence talks about the specimen. </p>

<p>2) I think the error is here:<br>
“Is nocturnal” and “is noiseless” is what you want to convey. By saying “plus being” it does 2 things.</p>

<p>a) it’s introducing a redundancy of a non parallel “to be” verb ( as in is, are, were, etc)
b) “and” would be perfectly acceptable – plus being is too wordy</p>

<p>3) An <em>economical and efficient</em> recycling center <em>is accessible</em> to the public, responsive to community needs, and <em>comply with</em> current federal regulations governing waste disposal. <em>No error</em></p>

<p>Ok, this is a classic parallel structure problem on the SAT.
The current sentence is that
The recycling center is accessible, is responsive, and is comply.
Separating it like this will help you realize that it is:</p>

<p>Accessible, responsive, and COMPLIANT. </p>

<p>There is no error in economical and efficient-- these are two adjectives describing the noun, center. </p>

<p>4) The subject in this sentence is “we”</p>

<p>“We are concerned about our exams” as opposed to “You are concerned about your exam” as opposed to “I am concerned about my exam.” </p>

<p>Do you see the difference now?</p>

<p>5) You said that “is essentially” is incorrect. </p>

<p>However, in this case, the word “essentially” functions as an adverb. Now an adverb describes another verb (mostly), but also adjectives and other adverbs.
“Is” is a conjugation of the verb “to be” so essentially modifies it as an adverb.</p>

<p>6) <em>To understand</em> twentieth-century economic practices, <em>we must</em> be sufficiently <em>familiar with</em> Keynesian theories, whether one agrees <em>with them</em> or not. <em>No error</em></p>

<p>This is a classic pronoun confusion. “Them” refers is a pronoun that refers to a plural subject such as “they” , “the bananas” , “the dogs”</p>

<p>In this case, “them” does not have a clear antecedent—or noun replacement. The two plural nouns we have are
a) economic practices </p>

<p>b) Keynesian theories </p>

<p>It is unclear if the sentence wants us to understand the economic practices or the Keynesian theories. That is why “them” is wrong. </p>

<p>Hopefully this helps!</p>

<p>6) has a pronoun shift. The answer must be “we must”–>“one must.”</p>

<p>@tau628‌ @marvin100‌ Guys, thanks a lot. I am super appreciated… :slight_smile: :smiley:
Just a small note: I have posted my answer with the CORRECT one , so …@marvin100‌ number 6, the correct answer is “with them”… :slight_smile: :wink: </p>

<p>Then the question is bad and is not from the College Board. That kind of pronoun shift is frequently tested and is a clear no-no on the exam.</p>