<p>Please help me reason why the correct answers are… correct. And if you will, please point out why my answers were wrong and what types of errors they belong to. The <em>__</em> means underlined in real test.</p>
<ol>
<li>No two of the specimens <em>was sufficiently alike to warrant them being called</em> members of a single species.</li>
</ol>
<p>My answer: was sufficiently alike to warrant their being called (wrong)
Correct: were sufficiently alike to warrant calling them</p>
<ol>
<li>Because the owl <em>is usually nocturnal</em> <em>plus being</em> virtually noiseless in flight, <em>it</em> <em>is seldom</em> seen by the casual observer. <em>No error</em></li>
</ol>
<p>My answer: No error
Correct answer: plus being</p>
<ol>
<li>An <em>economical and efficient</em> recycling center <em>is accessible</em> to the public, responsive to community needs, and <em>comply with</em> current federal regulations governing waste disposal. <em>No error</em></li>
</ol>
<p>My answer: economical and efficient
Correct answer: comply with</p>
<ol>
<li><em>As</em> we rely more and more on the Internet, <em>your</em> need for effective security planning and design <em>to safeguard</em> data <em>has increased</em>. <em>No error</em></li>
</ol>
<p>My answer: has increased
Correct answer: your</p>
<ol>
<li>The book <em>is essentially</em> a detailed and <em>very well document</em> record of what happened to <em>each of</em> the protestors. <em>No error</em></li>
</ol>
<p>My answer: is essentially
Correct answer: no error</p>
<ol>
<li><em>To understand</em> twentieth-century economic practices, <em>we must</em> be sufficiently <em>familiar with</em> Keynesian theories, whether one agrees <em>with them</em> or not. <em>No error</em></li>
</ol>
<p>My answer: no error
Correct answer: with them</p>
<p>Thanks a lot.
:x</p>