Yale (Kind of) Bans the Taliban Man

<p>

Good for Yale. On a less positive note, the NY Times article also contains a statement of continuing support from the Taliban man’s financial supporters:</p>

<p>

Why can’t these people use their money to help educate someone more deserving?</p>

<p>I agree that there are lots of people more deserving, but imagine the transformative power of four years of college in the U.S.</p>

<p>I actually read a very interesting article on him in the New York Times magazine a few years ago… He’s a young guy who has underwent a big transformation after 9/11. </p>

<p>He’s got famous after Farenheit 9/11, he was the guy who was being pestered by a woman about the Taliban’s treatment of women and he goes “I feel sorry for your husband.”</p>

<p>Interesting stuff.</p>

<p>I’d be interested to know what the guy’s academic profile (SATs, etc) was like. If he couldn’t hack it at Yale, then I think it’s good they got rid of him since no one should benefit from special treatment to such an extent. But if Hashemi was a bona fide genius, he should have stayed. He’s clearly changed enourmously from the man he once was. Personally, I don’t see much of a difference between him and the many Western intellectuals who were once communists/Christian fundamentalists/druggies/what-have-you before mellowing out with age.</p>

<p>He was in the Taliban. How good could his EC’s have been? :(</p>

<p>DRJ4, Your title put me in mind of this refrain from the Tempest (proving once again that Shakespeare said it all :slight_smile: ).
“Ban, Ban Ca-Caliban has a new master. Get a new man!”</p>

<p>As I recall from a prior thread about him, he has a fourth grade education.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>4 years of college in the US?</p>

<p>you’re right…he would definitely transform.</p>

<p>he’d become even MORE radical… ::eyes rolling::</p>

<p>This is good for diversity!</p>