<p>The Yale vs. UNC kid is not my kid. I thought my post made that clear. </p>
<p>I am not talking about those sorts of kids, many of whom-- let’s face it-- could probably get pretty excellent educations at the public library, on their own. I used to refer to D’s friends who were like this as “teacher proof.” At her large public HS some of the AP teachers were abysmal, yet the teacher-proof kids sailed on to get 5’s anyhow, which amazed me.</p>
<p>I am pointing out that a different set of factors come unto play when your kid is not a “no matter where, no matter what” high flyer. If I had one of those high flyer kids, unless I was rolling in dough (and we’re not), I’d probably also elect to save the money for grad school. It seems like a smart decision.</p>
<p>But with a humanities/arts kid, I do not forsee grad school. College felt like a one-shot for my daughter. Her becoming more intellectually excited was our main goal. I may be wrong; my D may have caught fire anywhere; it may have been her developmental ‘time’ to fly regardless of the school. But, because we could, we tried to make the decision that felt like the safest bet for her growth. </p>
<p>I think it’s odd that our family’s preference for Beloit over UC Berkeley is ignored by janesmom et al. If it was only the name, the “Elite!” thing, Berkeley was the biggest name on her list. Yet that was our last choice.</p>
<p>Okay, I can accept that I am considered elitist for picking a turbo-Beloit over a Beloit. </p>
<p>I have no doubt the quality of education at Beloit is excellent. I submit that nobody whose kid even applies to Beloit is terribly wrapped into name brands. In fact, had Beloit not been in the boonies of Wisconsin it might have been a tougher choice. I have said many times on these boards how impressed we were by the school and its faculty.</p>
<p>As for the 1350/1450 that was dstark’s rubric not mine. </p>
<p>I am QUITE sure that calmom’s D, for one, is a kid with worse SATs and INFINITELY more inherent spark/drive than my D. So I do not buy into SATs as the only measure of fire, intellect, etc. </p>
<p>Then again, neither do colleges. They do not pick only for SAT. Presumably the top LACs also admit so-so scorers who have evinced particular fire, drive, ability.</p>