We’ve just been through a pretty successful admissions process with S18 and D18. They are typical 1% kids, 4.0UW GPA, top 1-2% in their HS class, strong across the board, with good test scores, almost all 5s in their 9-10 APs and good ECs, very self-motivated. They went through normal public schools (as the youngest in their grade but not accelerated) and were admitted to many great schools (Berkeley, UCLA, etc, but not Princeton or Oxford).
But although it’s still a long way away, I look at this process with much more trepidation for S23 who we all know is much smarter, very much the 0.1% kid in math, but with far less across the board strength - he has ADHD and struggles with writing and executive functioning (organizational) issues. And we do soon have to think about high school for fall 2019.
30 years ago it was possible for me in the UK system as a kid somewhat like that (though without the EF issues) to skip a couple of grades and specialize in math for A-levels, dropping the stuff (English, languages) that I found hard (ECs were non-existent also). So I was fairly successful in school and college (I did a math degree and PhD at Cambridge) without ever having to work terribly hard. S23 is potentially as or more talented than me in math (as well as his abilities being quite obvious, the wide ranging tests we did for his ADHD/EF put him at 99.9%+ in that area).
But the US system really doesn’t seem set up to favor that sort of kid. He hasn’t been much interested in sports, mostly plays video games with his friends, and his school hasn’t been a lot of help (especially in addressing his EF challenges) despite being a selective public school for G&T kids. Even his math teacher (he did Algebra 1 this year in 7th grade) doesn’t appreciate him much and has had an unfortunate tendency to mark him down when he doesn’t pay attention and simply writes down the answers without any working because he just knows them (and because he doesn’t like writing). He can be very focused and competitive in the right setting when he’s motivated (he was above all 7th and all but one 8th grader in his school when he did the AMC-8 for fun) but he doesn’t like to stand out or do things on his own and we’ve been reluctant to push him into doing things (e.g. competitive math) that none of his friends are doing.
So my question is whether people who had a very “pointy” 0.1% kid did things differently, particularly in the high school years, from what they did for a regular “all-around” smart kid? Did you have to adjust his/her schooling? Did you find them a group of academic peers elsewhere and if so did that help? Did you allow them to push ahead in their strengths to keep them challenged? Did you feel they needed to tick all the boxes on ECs and across the board good grades or was one area of strength enough to balance out some weaknesses elsewhere? And how did it all work out in the end?