<p>the answer is purely physical reaction to bodily injury</p>
<p>what were some pain questions? those were tough. what was the modern research/irreverent to the theory question?
can someone check my post and/or compile sentence completion? </p>
<p>pain questions:
What was the purpose of the passage?
Based off Lines whatever through whatever, what does descartes theory of pain state?
(with regards to the narrator bringing up pain without injuries) what would a supported of Descartes’ theory state?</p>
<p>i can probably remember some more in a few min</p>
<p>i put cherished beliefs (I believe) because they were resistant to changing their beliefs</p>
<p>Yeah i don’t think I put the choice I said. What was C tho?</p>
<p>A was like The brain can shut it off at will…</p>
<p>@debater:
there was also transitory, and intermittent
i believe</p>
<p>Yay. all right in correlation with the consensus, so far</p>
<p>What was the purpose of the passage? fix an old theory with new stuff
Based off Lines whatever through whatever, what does descartes theory of pain state? don’t remember, but it sounded scientific
(with regards to the narrator bringing up pain without injuries) what would a supported of Descartes’ theory state? new methods haven’t been developed yet that can find the problems (lots of ds in the answer)</p>
<p>i can probably remember some more in a few min</p>
<p>@andevan - ah. dang. I had cherished beliefs at first and I completely misinterpreted that answer. so one wrong for sure so far.</p>
<p>Does anyone remember what the second word (the pair with “eschew” and something else) for the sentence completion with the native americans was?</p>
<p>What was the one about descarte’s theory of pain? It can’t be shut off at will because that’s the gate-control theory, not descartes’</p>
<p>why was it surprising?
i said that it was a novel idea.</p>
<p>Wait for the gate theory proponent</p>
<p>Isnt it something like they stressed themselves out or something?</p>
<p>o for pain, supporters of the gate thing theory would say that the problem is the …
I put the medical devices that cant detect the cause of injury?</p>
<p>kk415, it was adhere (to their traditional methods)</p>
<p>But they didnt talk about medical devices in the pasage?</p>
<p>@dfekfnle, I also put that, pretty sure that’s right as the gate control theory + descartes theory both indicate that everything is caused by some physical injury</p>
<p>What was the purpose of the passage? fix an old theory with new stuff</p>
<p>hmmm
i dont exactly thing that was the answer. The narrator didnt try to modify Descartes theory with results from the studies he talked about. And if you read carefully, you can tell that is tone isnt exactly approving of the theory either. Especially when talks about how Descartes theory doesnt explain how pain that doesnt come from injury exists</p>
<p>Seahawk, okay. Then for that sentence completion, shouldn’t it be the pair “flouted…relinquished”? I remember eliminating “eschew…adhere” because the contrast wouldn’t make sense.</p>
<p>aakash, it was novel because it meant new.
there were 2 questions on the back page abt. chronic pain, one was puzzling can’t remember the other, although they were fairly straight-forward</p>
<p>Compiled update ^^</p>
<p>Sentence Completion:
made a historian compelled to _____ their motives from ______ instead of records?
i put surmise, deeds
this artist lamenting something
arrest and preserve
deleterious: vaccine/medicine. They were afraid it would be bad
NA <strong>(-) new, but </strong>(+)old eschew/adhere (not the propound one)- also not flout and relinquish
anomalous
Nutcracker: indelible</p>
<p>-Other short passages:
Idyllic – sesame street
“fancy schools” and “apartment buildings to get into” reveal about the author’s attitude
Facing issues now
- Pain:
What was the purpose of the passage? using modern research for an old idea
Why using bell phrase: reinstate a comparison
Based off Lines whatever through whatever, what does descartes theory of pain state? purely physical reaction to bodily injury</p>
<p>What would supporter of the 2nd theory, gate theory (not Descartes) say to the end questions??? yeah I had no idea. Was it new methods haven’t been developed yet that can find the problems
- Environmental:
Conducted – preformed
author of passage 2 would respond to the author of passage 1? evidence for a need of education - Paige - Lying about age guy
birth certificate and the bible? supporting evidence
What would the author of Passage 1 respond to the Satchel Paige’s claim “I did nothing to stop it.”
I put like he contributed to the stories
unnecessarily trivial
was it conversational???</p>
<ul>
<li>Ceeve girl and house
What was “resolute” about the Tribulations passages? She was so sure or something/determination?</li>
</ul>
<p>What did the example of the chandelier in Tribulation serve to do?
example of recurrent phenomenon</p>
<p>What did the Ceeve family believe the purpose of memories was?</p>
<p>protect cherished beliefs</p>
<ul>
<li>Girl writing for G-ma
Why did the grandma learn to write love?
I put to contribute more directly to letter
“and i was off to the races” indicate?
b) the narrator enthusiastically went to work
depicting the formative stage of the development of the writer
self- satisfied (definitely, she was glad of taking over her g-ma’s live not conscientious: characterized by extreme care and great effort) she said she breezily took over
What was the purpose of the parenthesis (it talked about Californians and hockey)</li>
<li>to show the writer catering to her audience
used “8 1/2 by 11” paper?"</li>
</ul>
<p>Needed more space.
resignation</p>