<p>mirror/evoke was something about a storybook? and a winter-wonderland type scene</p>
<p>anyone else found the passages online? We should re look at the passages because all this dissension is just a huge mess. Try to find the one about alaska, that was kinda confusing as well as the leaves one.</p>
<p>Also, why isn’t it virtuoso and precocious? Wasn’t the sentence about some kid? Usually kids=precocious and fits better than exceptional.</p>
<p>OK did ANYONE have the sentence completion where it was: "The castle was built to _____ him but it ended up ____ his reputation? was it glorify…tarnish?</p>
<p>any other choices for the mirrors evoke one? i am concerned about what i put, for i have too many wrong already…</p>
<p>@nkukiller5</p>
<p>you can’t describe talents as precocious, only kids</p>
<p>The sentence about the kid was saying that he had talent, but nothing outstanding.
So it was prodigy/ whatever the other one was.</p>
<p>@ice
nope. I think that would be right (tarnishing of course) but that might have been experimental.</p>
<p>The illustrations mirrored the storybooks description of whatever evoking feeling of idk ?</p>
<p>to evoke a place?</p>
<p>oh ok thanks 141421356… yeah it fit the sentence fine but i didn’t know ANY of the other choices so i thought it could’ve been one of them. Good thing it was experimental!</p>
<p>What was the consensus on the last question for the grandmother/daughter one? Was it the formative writing experience?</p>
<p>@Zester: It’s prodigy/exceptional. You know, you can find a lot of these answers in earlier pages, and there’s also a consolidated list somewhere.</p>
<p>icesk8girl, either you mixed up the sentence, or it’s experimental :)</p>
<p>It said the kid was talented but he wasn’t to be considered a prodigy or virtuoso because his talents didn’t make him precocious or exceptional. My wording sucks but I remember all of that. I picked prodigy and exceptional but I feel like both of those answers are equally right!! :(</p>
<p>Oh, I remember the mirror and evoking one better now. The illustrations and text both mirrored some kind of setting that evoked…some kind of…feeling? Ha I’m sure that was right, though.</p>
<p>Hey I think I know which one you’re talking about but you mightve mixed it with another sentence?
The one I remember was something like ‘the ruler decreased taxes in his city not to ____ the citizens but to ____ his reputation’
And I can’t remember the answer choices but I do remember tthe tarnish and glorify, though those weren’t in the answer I put</p>
<p>@caseydann: Prodigy is confirmed because virtuoso doesn’t necessarily describe a kid.</p>
<p>@ Shirafune and Alwaysgraceful, that could still be an 800 depending on the curve. Most people are saying that they thought it was pretty hard, so it could go your way. I think 770-800 is a good estimate.</p>
<p>For the Descartes and pain one,
it asks what those who defend the theory would say
I said something along the lines of: the problem lies not with the theory but with diagnosis that can’t explain the pain.</p>
<p>@peng yeah</p>
<p>@o0 I sure the curve gives leniency for 3 wrong (including the subtraction of 3/4 points) It has never done that before though.</p>
<p>what u think -4-6 will be 710-740?</p>
<p>@ice
Yes formative. but still unsure about conscientious etc. </p>
<p>The other one fits better. Help/Boost something along those lines.</p>