<p>"The “taping crap on a desk” was a reference to my post above. First, he wasn’t taping anything onto a desk, he was using tape and paper to make sculptures. However, that is irrelevant, because you missed the whole point of the anecdote. I certainly did not find it “darling” that he wasted his school time with such activities. In fact I found it extremely annoying that he didn’t spend the dead time doing something more useful. Then I discovered from his teacher that he was not allowed to do anything–anything–when he finished assignments early. No reading, no extra math, no drawing. All of that would have made the rest of the class feel bad. He was told to sit still with his hands folded. "</p>
<p>And you worked with your teacher to solve this situation yes? What was the solution? And yes the tapping part is illrelevant because it could be one of dozens of inappropriate behavor. It was just one I read here. I didn’t catch it was yours. </p>
<p>“Sorry, Opie, but I don’t think there is any excuse for asking a third grader to sit and do absolutely nothing at all. You claim to be aghast at one-size-fits-all regimentation. Requiring every kid to spend exactly the same amount of time on every in-class assignment fits that bill pretty well, don’t you think?”</p>
<p>Now did I ever say that? I did say disruptions aren’t good. Are they? even if it’s your kid. As far as the requirements, as I said alot of districts are going to every elementary on task at the same time everyday. I didn’t vote for the guy who brought this about, did you? Just another underthought piece of legislation. </p>
<p>"Although it wasn’t my kid who was chastised for hopping on one foot, I’ll go to bat for that little guy, too. WHO CARES if a little boy hops on one foot instead of walking on two? "</p>
<p>Right up until he falls into another kid and splits that kid’s lip and chips a tooth when he falls?
If it’s your kid he falls into is it still peachy?
Even when the dental bills come?
</p>
<p>"I was a Cub Scout and a Girl Scout leader for many years, and there were many times I wished the kids would sit still to make my role easier, but I came to realize that most kids want to move because that’s how kids are; in most cases they aren’t trying to “draw attention to themselves without regard to others”. "</p>
<p>Wrong. Most kids are selfish early in life, it’s a survival skill. They learn the when and where it’s appropriate as they get older. It’s how we all are made up. </p>
<p>I have spent many years working with kids in different activities. Some children seek attiention be it positive or negative because it’s still attiention. </p>
<p>My spouse is dealing with one “only child” right now that will deliberately disrupt the class to get recess in because he wants one to one time. He’s actually very good 1/1 and behaves totally different. When the rest of the class is present he fights everything very step of the way. The thing is there are 25 other kids who all want the same 1/1 time and they all have to learn to allow others room to learn. </p>
<p>“I don’t find disruptive behavior “fun” and I don’t like “cheeky”, but nobody has mentioned any behavior of that sort on this thread.”</p>
<p>generic terms. I tend to read the post, I don’t focus on who made it. I can see may have to treat you with kinder gentler gloves as you personalize things and then fail to see any grey between extremes. That is why I added even good kids get in trouble from time to time, it does not make them evil. does it? </p>
<p>I think if you review my points about the atheletes and college preference you’d find that I’m fairly reasonable. I’ve got wonderful kids, it took alot of beatings to get them there. Thank god my arm held out.
</p>
<p>Even wonderful kids screw up from time to time. Even mine, even yours.</p>