<p>robotmom1414,</p>
<p>I did go to Stanford, which I chose over Yale; I spent some time there doing research with a prof and nearly went to Yale for my PhD in CS (I work in a very specialized area of CS that few top schools excel at).</p>
<p>The post I linked to regarding Yale CS was mostly to dispel continued rumors on this forum that Yale CS “sucks” - people have this obsession with the top 10 and think anything outside of it is considered not worthwhile. (People like to say Harvard “sucks” at engineering when in reality it’s decent.) As I explained there, Yale CS used to be one of the best (top 5-10), and during this time it produced tons of well-known people in academia and industry. Sometime around the death of the department chair, the department started falling apart - faculty left, research and courses were cut, the facilities were changed, etc. Today, Yale is still strong in CS compared to the vast majority - having a top 20 or 30 CS department is quite an accomplishment. But it’s a very far cry from having the perennially ranked #1 CS department which dominates every other school in pretty much any accolade - # Turing Award winners (the “Nobel Prize” of CS - nearly half of them have gone to Stanford profs), # companies founded (>5,000), # alumni as professors in top departments, etc. In other words, yeah I think Yale’s great for CS, but it’s no Stanford. ;)</p>
<p>The Charles Babbage Institute offers a bunch of interesting “oral history” interviews from pioneers in CS, and many of them focus on the essential role Stanford has played throughout the development of CS - from the formation of the field at Stanford in the 1950s to the growth of Silicon Valley over the ensuing decades to the influence and renown of professors today. Some of them also cover Yale’s CS department in the early days of the field. Here are some with descriptions:</p>
<p>[History</a> of computer science - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia](<a href=“History of computer science - Wikipedia”>History of computer science - Wikipedia)</p>
<p>The description you gave of your son indicates he would thrive in either culture, but one caveat: if he enjoys learning/working in STEM fields and in helping/working with others, the edge definitely goes to Stanford. About 20% of Yale students graduate in STEM fields each year; that number is closer to 50% at Stanford. Arts have a much greater presence at Yale, similar to the presence of STEM fields on Stanford’s campus (i.e. STEM is to Yale as the arts are to Stanford; of course both are strong in the humanities and social sciences).</p>
<p>Here’s something for your son to do: to go through the bulletins for Stanford and Yale (and any other school he’s considering) and compare the course offerings in areas he’s interested in. It doesn’t matter if one or the other offers tons and tons of courses - if they’re not in an area that he’s interested in, it’s a moot point. At Stanford there’s a huge variety of courses, so he’s likely to find lots of courses up his alley, but more importantly undergrads can take almost any grad-level course they want - and most CS undergrads take many grad classes. This works out well for those going for a PhD, since many PhD programs (including Stanford’s) allow you to transfer credit from grad-level classes taken as an undergrad.</p>
<p><a href=“http://explorecourses.stanford.edu%5B/url%5D”>http://explorecourses.stanford.edu</a>
<a href=“Welcome | Office of the University Printer”>Welcome | Office of the University Printer;
<p>When I was in high school, I received likely letters from Yale, Stanford, and Harvard. LLs work magnificently well because students are too blinded by getting in, and being fawned over as one of the top, to realize that it’s all a ploy. I know I was pretty wide-eyed and didn’t really consider that these colleges had just successfully executed a spectacular “influencing exercise” on me in sending me a LL. Coming down from the kool-aid, I realized that likely letters shouldn’t have an influence at all - they’re a cheap ploy to get students to attend by making them feel “special,” and they allow colleges to court these students without having much substance to offer (e.g. strong academics in the student’s interest). </p>
<p>Think about it: the only thing that’s different from before is that your son has a likely letter in hand now. Yale hasn’t changed; it still has the same infrastructure and resources that it had when your son first applied, and he would have gotten to see all of that during Yale’s normal admit weekend. But the LL itself is enough to make someone feel more strongly about a college and thus to attend; that was the case for me, and I think for most LL recipients. That’s exactly the effect they want to have. Don’t let it fool you - choose based on infrastructure/support that your son finds relevant and, of course, on personal fit. The best part here is that in this case there’s no “wrong” choice. I might say there’s a “better” choice
but both are great schools that your son would probably thrive at.</p>