<p>“Olberman, who brags incessantly about attending Cornell,”</p>
<p>which is fully justified</p>
<p>" is not exactly telling the whole story. "</p>
<p>In what respect? he DID attend Cornell, and it IS in the Ivy League; both his university and his college can reasonably be considered to be prestigious institutions by most reasonable standards and measures.</p>
<p>“While CALS is a good school by most standards,”</p>
<p>exactly the point</p>
<p>.""back when he went there, it was not all that selective, "
What does “all that” mean? I don’t have data here on its relative selectivity at that time, do you? Or are you just taking her assertion at face value? Post your supporting data. More than likely it was in a similar place to today; a very selective college, from a broad perspective, though there were other colleges that were yet more selective. the same can be said for Arts & Sciences. Moreover, then , as now, CALS’s quality, and strength of programs in its various fields, transcends its admissions profile.</p>
<p>“and it is still not as selective as the rest of the Ivy league.”
There are colleges in other Ivy league universities that are, and were, undoubtedly less selective than CALS. To name a couple, Penn’s College of Nursing, Columbia’s College of General Studies. Even were this not the case, CALS was likely still more selective than the preponderance of colleges in the United States.</p>
<p>“If the truth hurts,”
It doesn’t. He attended a pestigious college, of a prestigious university. This is the case even if there existed some other colleges, and some other universities, that were yet more prestigious.</p>
<p>" then quit ridiculing other people because of the schools they attended, just because you don’t agree with their politics."</p>
<p>I agree with that. It really doesn’t matter.</p>