<p>I recently served as a judge for an “Academic Decathalon” competition that included a segment where the participants had 30 or 40 minutes to write an essay, choosing from among three prompts. They knew in advance what general areas the prompts might be in, but not specifically what they were. One of the prompts was literature-based (essentially a softball, down-the-center question about a book they had been required to read), one was a fairly straightforward climatology/global warming question, and I can’t remember the third because no one answered it. The set of essays I judged (together with a high school teacher) were from kids with unweighted GPAs between 3.0 and 3.5, and some alternates (i.e., not “first team”) from the group with higher GPAs, although if the kids I knew were any indication all of them were academically ambitious and taking challenging courses. All the schools were good schools: Five well-known suburban public schools, my son’s urban public academic magnet, and a suburban private Catholic school.</p>
<p>What I’m saying is that these were good students, not necessarily great students, heading for good colleges.</p>
<p>To say that the essays were horrible would be a gross understatement. The other judge and I, trying to align our critical faculties, spent about 20 minutes discussing how much we disliked the first essay we read (at random), and why. That wound up being the essay that scored second-highest of the 25 we read! Half of them were almost completely inadequate – no organization, no ideas, poor word choice, poor use of evidence . . . The other half barely attained the heights of mediocrity. The very best two or three might have deserved a B or B-, and that was with oodles of credit for anything resembling an idea.</p>
<p>But I will say this: The essays sure differentiated themselves. There was an enormous range in quality, albeit from mediocre to awful. We learned a lot about the skills of the students who wrote them.</p>
<p>I also judged prepared and impromptu speeches by some of the same kids. Their prepared speeches were of much, much better quality. Even the impromptu speeches were superior to the essays, although there was definitely a correlation between kids who did well on the essay and kids who did well on the impromptu speech.</p>
<p>In the end, I think the exam-type essay, especially if written without the benefit of a word processor, is probably a poor tool to tell what a student can do. I certainly wouldn’t want to read too many of them.</p>