<p>And of course, if what we really wanted to do was help people of Lima’s “particular race” overcome true hardship, we’d turn our attention and resources where slavery is actually still going on:</p>
<p>No, you missed it. My point here is that no one from one particular race can claim to know how a person of another particular race perceives/experiences life. </p>
<p>
</p>
<p>Seems pretty logical. I think most people would agree with it, even IP.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>I am not sure what your race is. I was referring to white people. If you are white, then yes, I feel in the US you are free to be whoever you want.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>I’m not sure what you’re trying to say here. I was certainly brought up to know I could choose my identity (rich, poor,educated,leader, etc…). I know the history of the Irish (my heritage) and that after a generation is was very easy to “blend in”. my American ancestors were able to “choose” to affiliate with the Irish race or not. And yes I have to define myself as a member of the white race (uhm, I am white so its kind of hard to hide). I don’t really have a choice in that matter. I’m not sure if you’re proposing the whole “colorblind” thing because that doesn’t really work.</p>
<p>he said he felt treating people differently based on race is immoral. It would be immoral of him to do nothing if he knew people were being treated differently.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>You have no idea how much! How else do you think I got the perspective I have?</p>
<p>Let’s take this slowly: You know with absolute certitude that I cannot grasp what it is to be a member of your race. You know that about my race. Yet you go on to say that members of different races cannot know what it is to be a different race.</p>
<p>If you do not grasp the inherent contradiction in your logic then . . . good luck in college!</p>
<p>I see where the confusion came from, I reread my post.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>Sorry to be so unclear. When I said “as a person of a particular race you” I wasn’t referring to IP, just people in general. That we are all of a particular race and that none of us can assume we know the issues faced by other races.</p>
<p>Sorry if you took it as a personal attack, it isn’t what I meant.</p>
<p>“if what we really wanted to do was help people of Lima’s “particular race” overcome true hardship, we’d turn our attention and resources where slavery is actually still going on:”</p>
<p>Exactly! Instead of 4500 posts about elite US college admissions.</p>
<p>Wait; what is Lima’s “race”? A lot of the countries in the link were in the middle east or South Africa.</p>
<p>Despite the many twists, iterations, and mental games which would make Simon Baker ecstatic, that is very much what he is relying on to establish his vacuous allegation of discrimination. Test scores is all he really has to establish a certain meritocracy, and as pathetically twisted as this concept of meritocracy might be, there is NOTHING else.</p>
<p>Which describes dozens, in fact hundreds, of public institutions. Therefore, let me make a suggestion. When your daughter comes of College Application age, do keep it a secret if she intends, or you encourage her, to apply to private institutions. Because if she applies to anything other than colleges which fit the above, be prepared for the bloodiest crucifixion in CC history. (Of you, not her.) </p>
<p>I, for one, have every intention of holding your family’s decisions up to the scrutiny of moral integrity and consistency, without an unsupportable excuse about how she otherwise will be sunk into poverty and ignominy in the arguably wealthiest land on the planet. So hopefully, you are already hard at work indoctrinating her into the evil orientations of elite colleges and their vile “racism.”</p>
What is the public evidence of soul searching and course correction of which you speak? Can you clarify?</p>
<p>epiphany- Good points. The public institutions are bound by certain rules and regulations by virtue of their accepting federal funds. Private institutions are permitted to put together a class as they see fit. They speak of building a class, with whatever criteria they choose. If one does not like the policies of the private colleges, LAC and U’s then by all means, don’t apply.</p>
Especially at MIT which definitely accepts lots of math grinds. I know many MIT graduates disagreed with the direction MIT took under her leadership - because they felt MIT’s mission is to be the premier tech school and not like the school up the river.</p>
<p>And yeah Marilee Jones resigned (to prevent being fired) in 2007 and I did the happy dance at her comeuppance.</p>
<p>Of course not. My child has the full benefit of being born to a upper middle class family. This has nothing to do with race. This is not a socialist country where people from all SES have the same advantages.</p>
<p>Shrinkwrap, how exactly did Indians benefit from slave trade? Britain may have benefited, but so what? Britain was sucking India dry and subjugating the Indian people using brutal means that the same time. Perhaps you should read some Indian history rather than claiming that somehow Indians benefited?</p>
<p>I care not about other countries in the world, as I didn’t immigrate there. I immigrated to the USA and I know my rights under the law. I am entitled to Equal Protection and so are all races. If you don’t like it, amend the Constitution.</p>
<p>That’s why I speak, even though I don’t have a horse in the race. Asians are treated differently in college admissions and that’s totally immoral.</p>
<p>Yes. You missed that the above applies to Asians only. If AA was repealed and URMs were to hear the above, the Western civilization as we know it would come to an end.</p>
<p>Since private institutions that accept Federal grants are subject to the same laws as public institutions, I would rather wait for this issue to go back up in front of USSC.</p>