Are you ready for some football?

Based on how Wilson was running for his life last night (6 sacks, 2 fumbles, a number of other close calls that left me wondering how did he get out of that), maybe that experiment isn’t working so well.

One reason Seattle may have so many UFAs is that those players typically make the minimum, and Seattle is up against the cap - they currently have the least amount of available cap space of any team in the league.

What do you mean by this? They have the same number of players as every other team, they have one of the largest coaching staffs of any team (25 coaches - compare that to the Patriots who have only 15), they have more front office executives than a lot of other teams.

Meaning that for the most part, no one is irreplaceable, much like Belichek’s philosophy. Also, like Bob Kraft, Paul Allen doesn’t unnecessarily insert himself into the football operations, unlike Jerry Jones and Dan Snyder. And furthermore unlike Dan Snyder, Paul Allen isn’t the second coming of Ted Septien (owned the dreadful Cleveland Cavaliers) or cheap skates Calvin Griffith (Minnesota Twins) or Bob Irsay (Indianpolis Colts). Snyder is not a cheap skate but he knows next to nothing about pro football or personnel management. Ask Norv Turner.

In all fairness to Wilson, his O line is dreadful, Seattle spent a lot of money on Wilson and on getting Graham, and then left the O line as an afterthought and it shows, Wilson is really good and running for his life and throwing the ball, but at his size he is going to get hit one of these days and suffer a major injury. There is a difference between being an efficient organization, where no one is irreplaceable, and being an organization that spends its money foolishly. Given the nature of how important a QB is in this league, spending money on a good QB is critical (and while I personally don’t think wilson is elite, I think he is a really good QB, which are rare), but protecting him is also critical.

As far as last night’s blown call goes, it doesn’t surprise me, Sports Illustrated did a study of the ‘home field advantage’, and their conclusion was that it wasn’t the crowd noise, ti wasn’t fired up players, it was that refs favor the home team. With Seattle, kind of obvious, between the Green Bay fiasco (which in part also was replacement refs) and this one, kind of shows it. The refs more than likely with their claim it was "not a deliberate bat’ or whatever, were basically giving one to the home team, that isn’t that obscure a rule. I personally think if there is a question about a rule, they should have an automatic method to send it to an official for review.

In terms of Seattle converting defensive lineman, they aren’t the only ones, several teams are doing that. With the college game, with its emphasis on spread offenses and the zone read/triple option offenses, they are diverging from the NFL, lineman in those kind of schemes don’t learn about things like zone blocking, the footwork required for blocking in the NFL, in a sense those kind of schemes simplify the lineman’s job, because they rely more on misdirecting a defense rather than synchronized blocking the way it works in the NFL…and defensive lineman in college still have to learn the skills. This was always true to a certain extent, but in the bad old days of 6 preseason games, and training camps with 2 a days, there was time to learn these skills, but with the fewer pre season games and the limits on training, there isn’t time to turn them around…and it is kind of self fulfilling prophesy, because you can’t allow lineman to learn on the job, that is how you end up getting QB’s hurt. One of the things I am convinced of is that the last CBA, that so limited practices and such, has hurt the game, watching the game last night and other games I have watched, the amount of sloppy play, bad tackling, bad blocking, qb’s making bad decisions, shows that fundamental skills are not being learned…I also suspect it may be why, ironically, that more injuries have happened.

Hmm, not sure I agree with this. I feel like Seattle seems to be deliberately implementing a “star and scrub” system, where they they have a handful of really highly paid star players and they fill in the rest with whatever warm bodies they can find. For example, Seattle’s 5 highest paid players in 2016 with count for $64 million against the cap, the Patriots’ top 5 will be $53 million. Seattle’s 10 highest-paid players in 2016 will count almost $96 million on the cap, the Patriots’ top 10 are $87 million.

That extra money lets the Patriots have higher quality players in the middle of the roster.

We are four weeks into the season, it seems like that should be enough time. I don’t know if this is the explanation for the low quality of play this year. The Patriots have been playing three rookies on their o-line at times, one of whom is an UFA, and they’ve been able to keep Brady upright.

I also think the reason you convert players is they’re cheap. Colleges are turning out good OLs. NE converted Stephen Neale, who was a wrestler, into a guard and kept him on the roster until he became good because he was cheap (and played special teams but he was really cheap). They have budgets for each position and these were stressed by a) the left tackles making a lot more - thanks to attention paid to Freeney, Jared Allen, etc. - and b) the right tackles making more, thanks to moving the DLs to different spots on the line and now c) guards are making a lot. NE dropped Logan Mankins because his production didn’t equal his large paycheck.

No surprise there. I’m sure that the converted linemen on the Seahawks are at the low end of the salary scale for their position. As for your other points, come to think of it, the Seahawks have often relied on undrafted and low draft pick free agents, sometimes with much success. Don Dufek played for the Seahawks for years on special teams, even though he was cut several times by the team. Come the end of the pre-season, they would simply resign him. It became a local joke among players and the Seattle media. ‘Oh, they cut Don Dufek again. See you next week, Don.’ I imagine the CBA has outlawed that sort of thing today.

BTW, since the report that Ryan Tannehill makes fun of the practice squad players, Dante Stallworth tweeted that Tom Brady used to pay practice squad and “look squad” - meaning the guys who pretend to be the opposition (if you don’t know that) - if they picked him off.

Bill Belichick on teaching his players the rules. From his weekly press conference:

FOXBOROUGH, Mass. – New England Patriots coach Bill Belichick went deep when asked Tuesday about the process of teaching his players the NFL’s thick rulebook, which is a hot-button topic after Monday Night Football’s missed “illegal bat” penalty call.

When asked if teaching the rulebook is an ongoing process throughout the season, and if he has to teach all new players the rules, Belichick’s first response was, “I think it’s a really good question, but it would entail probably a pretty lengthy answer.”

Belichick then went lengthy in noting “there are so many different levels that that question encompasses.”

Some of the points he made:

Different with rookies. “The first thing we do is teach them the rules in the National Football League and in particular make them aware of the changes between the college rules and the pro rules, which there are a significant number. And we don’t really assume because we have no way of knowing how educated or uneducated they are on the rules, if they even are the same between the two – between college and professional football. So, it starts there.”

Coaches meeting in spring with NFL sets the stage for training camp. “The NFL comes in and they meet with the coaching staff in the spring, which is a very informative meeting, and then they meet with the team in training camp and go through the rules changes and it’s usually done during the time when the officials come to work the few days of training camp that they do for each team. So, that’s also good. It creates a good dialogue between the officials, the players and the coaches, and gives coaches and players an opportunity to ask questions. Sometimes the dialogue goes back and forth – how’s this being coached, how’s this being officiated and so forth. All of that is done with the intention of trying to get everybody on the same page.”

Position coaches devote time in spring and summer to rules. “Each of our position coaches devotes a significant amount of time in the spring and then also in training camp, particularly in individual, one-on-one-type drills where a lot of times there are only two or three guys on the screen instead of all-22 film so you can really get a good, close-up look at a lot of rules like that – the holding and illegal contact and offensive pass interference, defensive pass interference – all those kinds of things. So that’s covered very much on an individual basis, specifically to that position. Obviously, the offensive guard doesn’t have to know everything about pass interference and vice versa, but it’s important for them to know the things in their position and how the game is being officiated.”

Discussion continues in full-team meetings throughout the year. “I talk to the team on a regular basis on situational plays, which involve officiating, timing, utilization of timeouts and so forth and so on, so that’s probably on a regular basis from training camp all the way through the end of the season – call it once a week or something like that – somewhere in that vicinity. Sometimes it’s more than that, but always trying to keep our team aware of situations, and a lot of times we change the situation a little bit just to extend the conversation about a play. ‘So this is what happened, but if something else [happened] or if they hadn’t had timeouts or if the ball was here, or the ball was there,’ just try to understand and comprehend totally what we’re doing from a team standpoint or an individual situation.’ The whole sideline, ball security, whistle, all those kind of ball possession plays, those are very important for everybody to understand and we stress those a lot. Any time the ball is loose, like it was in last night’s [Seahawks-Lions] game, try to make sure everybody understands what they can do, what they can’t do.”

Special teams is a whole different discussion. “Once you get into the kicking game, you can multiply everything that happens on offense and defense exponentially because you not only have the possession plays, but then you have all the plays that happen when the ball is kicked, and those rules sometimes are different than plays of possession like a runner or a receiver or a returner who’s carrying the ball. There is the whole handling of the ball and the kick and did it cross the line of scrimmage and so forth and so on.”

Bottom line, it’s a lot to get one’s arms around. “It’s a lot for the officials to understand, it’s a lot for the coaches to understand, and it’s a lot for the players to understand. But in the end we try to look at the rule book as a useful tool, something that can benefit us if we know what we have to work with, how to make the best of a situation based on the way the rules are written and try to maximize our opportunities there. But that being said, there is still a lot happening in a short amount of time. It’s challenging for all of us – players, coaches and officials. … We could probably talk about that one for weeks.”

Belichick knows the rules probably better than most NFL head officials do, if the thing with Detroit happened when NE was playing, the refs would have gotten an earful from Belichick, I don’t know if it would have influenced their call, but from what I hear the refs have a lot of respect for his knowledge and I suspect they don’t want to come out on the losing end with him.

As far as this being 4 weeks in the system and by now things should improve, not necessarily, that in many ways is kind of like expecting a concert violinist to limit their practicing time, and make it up on the concert stage. If you have bad technique, if your footwork isn’t right, if you are tackling badly once the season starts, you don’t learn that ‘on the job’, and practice time during the playing year itself has been restricted a great deal, so when are they going to correct these mistakes? When you are an offensive lineman, a large part of what they do has to be in muscle memory, they have to be able to react without thinking, and if you are coming from a college system where the offensive line play is relatively unsophisticated, and are moving into zone blocking schemes and complicated protections, you need to learn those in practice until they become instinct. Likewise, when you are tackling, you need to learn how for example to tackle someone like Rob Gronkowski or Chris Ivory, you have to learn how to do open field tackling, if you are a slot corner you have to learn what your responsibility is, in a cover 2 or cover 3. Obviously things improve as the season goes on, or should, but with fundamentals it is very, very hard during the playing year to break those habits, and that is what causes the sloppiness. I don’t know how many times I saw defenses pull an A gap blitz using a safety, and the running back, who should have picked it up, is oblivious, instead of picking up the blitz, or positioning themselves to be a dump off, they are focusing on who knows what, must drive coaches nuts.

Oh, terrific. The Trojans’ first play results in their QB being sacked. On the second play the QB throws an interception, and the third play they get a 15 yd penalty. What the heck?

hayden:
Does Mark Sanchez have his brother playing QB?

LOL - well, that’s the bizarre thing. The QB, Kessler, has only had one interception in the season before this game. And he’s already had two in this game alone! The commentators were saying that USC had their midterms yesterday and today and they’re speculating the team is off their game.

I guess the good news in that would be that they’re taking their midterms seriously …

Watching Houston/Indy: how bad can Houston bleep? Their defensive line is ineffective despite having the guy in every single NFL commercial plus the top draft pick (and an aged Wilfork) and they seem surprised by fairly basic offensive plays. Arian Foster looks slow: either not recovered fully or just slowed. Even so, Houston should have more points but they keep screwing up, notably a pass right through a receiver’s hands near the goal line directly to the safety. As they say, “you got to make that catch!”

Lergmon, you and I are doomed to a long night.

Best play so far: 11 minute left in 4thQ, Indy tosses a pass into the end zone that isn’t going to be caught and Houston DB, who is out of position, runs up behind the WR and shoves him. Not gently. In front of the official. And then turns with his arms raised like “how can you call THAT a penalty?!?” 1st down on the 1.

On the other hand, Gore has run it from inside the 5 a couple of times, and didn’t fumble.

I take it back: about 3 minutes left, Houston needs a TD to tie. WR goes out of bounds, is grabbed and turns around and says something to the DB and is flagged for taunting. 15yd penalty. You then see his coach, who is right next to the play, saying “How could you say that?” Welcome to the land of idiots!

He flipped the football right into the defender’s chest. Stupid.

BOW DOWN TO WASHINGTON!!! (it deserves all caps since I don’t get to say to much any more). I doubt it had to do so much with the SC players studying for midterms and more to do with the WA players wanting to show Sark where to get off. It gives a person hope for the future of all things purple and gold.

Houston was as bad a team as I’ve seen … oh wait, I forgot SF!