Are you ready for some football?

Having just watched the Frontline documentary last night, it is far more damning of the NFL and far more frightening than the Concussion film. It also goes a bit further in time, dealing with the death of Junior Seau and how the NFL slandered Dr. Omalu to try to coerce Seau’s son to not cooperate with him.

We see this over and over again with tobacco companies, climate change and energy companies, dangerous cars, dirty cars, fracking, etc., and the industry deniers who can’t see past their potentially impacted profits. The NFL has supposedly been studying concussions since 1994 and they haven’t concluded anything useful yet? They could focus more on prevention and treatment, on “building a better mousetrap” with helmet design but they are really still just paying lip service to the idea and only because they have to.

I like football too but I hate the NFL. It’s what keeps me from loving football.

And yet a fair amount of football fans complain when players are flagged or suspended for hits to the head. Just the other day a Steelers player went down after a vicious hit, and the opposing coach defended his player. Fans are upset at the suspension, and his teammate has gone on record as saying the injured player faked his injury, posted a profanity laced video complaining about officiating, etc. If the NFL is going to be held accountable for the results of head injuries, they have no choice but to change the rules in such a way as to protect players from devastating hits to the head. Personally, I’m tired of hearing fans complain about this. No sport is worth permanent brain damage, and this is something you’d think everyone would support. But no.

@Nrdsb4 , I agree that player was so out of line in both the illegal hit and in the response afterwords. Recently a presidential candidate bemoaned the fact that football has gone “soft”. What he doesn’t understand is that it’s critical to protect the players because if they don’t protect the players, at all levels amd ages, then parents will,stop allowing their kids to play. And if kids aren’t allowed to play, there won’t be an NFL.

Football is the one sport my kids will never, ever be allowed to play. My dad’s car accident resulted in a severe TBI so I know the effects of brain injuries first hand. They’re really horrible in a way that I don’t think most people understand unless they’ve actually been around people with TBI or other brain injuries.

I really can’t understand why anyone lets their kid(s) play football. Yes, obviously all sports have risks but most don’t purposely put you in harm’s way the way that football does.

Boxing is also crazy imo.

^ True. I don’t watch boxing so I tend to forget about it.

And what is with all that cage fighting, MMA stuff? No helmets at all - crazy.

One of the people in the Frontline documentary is a former WWE wrestler (and Harvard grad, lol) who is helping one of the brain researchers. He’s also afraid that he may develop CTE from his wrestling and football past.

There was a hit in the Pittsburgh/Cincy game that set of Cincinnati, the Pittsburgh player hit Giovani Bernard hard and basically put him out of the game. The hit was helmet to helmet, Bernard caught the ball and was just starting to run and the defender put down his head and popped him, you could see where his helmet hit Bernard’s and forced it up…yet according to Nantz and Simms, it was a ‘clean hit’, and Mike Carey, who was a pretty good ref in his day, said it was clean, and I can’t understand it being legal, two heads hitting like that is dangerous.

Football has a big problem, even if you leave out helmet to helmet contact, when you have someone running who can run a 4.4 40 and a defender running at him who is only slightly slower, when they meet there is massive deceleration, not to mention when you hit the ground. In Concussion, Dr. Omalu makes the point that woodpeckers and birds like Ospreys routinely take forces as high as 1000g’s on their heads, and they are fine, because their brains are held in place by these support structures that keep the brain from flopping around in the skull, whereas human beings have no such protection and yet football players can experience 100g’s…and with players getting bigger, faster, and stronger, it is only going to get worse.

A lot of the problem is with coaches at lower levels, a lot of them still have the old “put your head down and charge” kind of mentality, and if a kid is knocked senseless, or can’t seem to play, they are a wuss, and that doesn’t help. To give you an idea, my son went to middle school at a local private school known as much for nuturing kids as academics, and they offered football. My son had never played, and the idiot coach had him up against a kid several years older in tackling drills, kid slammed my son to the ground. My son is not one to cry, he got up, but told the coach he couldn’t lift his arm, the coach told him he just needed to ‘walk it off’…when my son said he still couldn’t use the arm, and wanted to go see the nurse, the coach basically told him to get lost, made him carry his gear back to the school, violating all kinds of rules (when a kid is hurt, you never send them someplace alone, guy probably did it thinking ‘kid is a sissy’ or something like that), my son ended up waiting outside the school because he couldn’t open the door holding his gear…it turned out his upper arm was broken (90% fracture), but the coach assumed it was my son being a weakling or something (that coach should thank his lucky stars my wife was there to calm me down, I was literally searching for my favorite baseball bat, I could have broken his legs no problem for doing what he did). The NFL has this program now to supposedly train coaches on safety, but it is window dressing, because most coaches still are doing the same thing (take a look at I think TLC, that has a program on little kids playing football, it is eye opening what they do to the kids).

I agree, the NFL is going to face a problem, because while there is still the culture of football, especially in communities where sports are seen as a way out, being the way to go, if kids stop being allowed to play football, where are the players going to come from? If I was going to encourage a kid to play a sport, it would be baseball, you get a lot better money, it is all guaranteed, and your lifetime is a lot longer in the sport, if you are good enough.

@musicprnt, it’s a very good point that it’s every bit as dangerous for the player who is hitting the defenseless receiver or other player. Both heads are being traumatized. The players are getting so big and fast that I really fear for these guys.

I think players and coaches often forget that the point of the defense is to stop forward progress. It is not to knock the you know what out of them. It’s not necessary to cause brain damage in order to stop forward progress. It’s just NOT.

The problem is that the ‘hit’ is still a highlight, it is something that people and coaches and such look for. One of the things that has come out recently that challenges assumptions that part of the problem is the protective gear that makes hard hits possible, they are now finding that rugby players are showing many of the same problems.

There are no easy answers, I think in the end that football is a violent game being played by players who are getting bigger, faster and stronger. I think it is going to be a combination of rules in terms of hitting, plus finding ways to mitigate the damage done, that may end up saving the game.

Didn’t take Chip Kelly long to land on his feet:

http://footballscoop.com/news/the-49ers-have-hired-chip-kelly/

He didn’t get total personnel control, so he may be stuck with Kaepernick (almost $16 mil cap hit for 2016). It will be interesting to see if he thinks he can succeed with Kaep or if they blow everything up and draft a qb. I don’t think Blaine Gabbert is the solution.

I think hiring Chip Kelly sends a message to Kaepernick that ownership/gm still believe he can be a factor, especially now that that Kelly is their guy. I personally would have rather seen them hire Mike Shanahan or Mike Holmgren (who expressed interest at some point), fire gm Baalke, and sent Kaepernick packing (especially before now when it would have cost them a lot less). I think that was a total waste of time to try and retool his mechanics before last season and I personally don’t think Kaepernick has enough smarts to consistently play well in the nfl.

Kapernick may do well in a chip kelly offense, as much as I don’t particularly care for it, the kelly offense would fit his style both passing and running. SF fans should be glad they didn’t hire Shanahan, he is a coach who basically got a championship team in Denver and won, and he also was responsible for destroying RGIII (the part that RGIII himself didn’t destroy that is). Thing is, with quarterbacks SF might not have a lot of options, if there are any decent QB’s in the college draft (and I haven’t seen any I consider to be that great shakes coming into the draft), it is likely cleveland may draft the top one, given that it looks like with hiring Jackson that Johnny Football is done in Cleveland, word is that Jackson pretty much said he would take the job but Manziel had to go (shows signs he is a smart guy, I wouldn’t touch Manziel with a 10 foot poll…wouldn’t be surprised if he ended up on the Bills, Ryan loves headcases). Kapernick is not an ideal quarterback, but given that they likely are not going to find a free agent or a college kid in the draft that is worth anything, Kapernick is not necessarily a bad choice. SF was smart not giving Kelly personnel control, as a GM he quite frankly, shall we say, underachieved, and his mania for getting ex Oregon players was idiotic.

Kaepernick actually has a very team-friendly contract as he got very little guaranteed money for a qb - only about $12 million in a 6 year deal. As long as they cut him by April 1 every year, the cap hit is pretty mild, because only that year’s salary becomes guaranteed if he is on the roster after April 1.

The 49ers have the #7 pick this year… there hasn’t been a raging debate about college qbs like there was last year with Winston and Mariota, so I assume that means this is not considered a banner year for qbs.

I agree that Kelly has a good chance of resurrecting Kaepernick. When he is allowed to run some he playas better. It gives him confidence.

It will be interesting to see what the Saints do with Drew Brees. He has a $30 million cap number for 2016, and the Saints are already $7mil+ over the cap. I assume they will extend and restructure him, but you can only kick the can down the road so many times.

Flacco is another qb with a crazy cap number next year, $28.5 mil, and it is higher next year so he will be difficult to restructure. The Ravens have little cap space for 2016

Brady’s 2016 cap number is less than Kaepernick’s and RGIII’s. Amazing.

Not a top QB draft, Goff or Lynch are the top 2, and they are not exactly earthshaking, the kid from Michigan State, Cook, is up there, but he didn’t exactly do all that great against Alabama and his draft stock dropped considerably. At best, most of the QB’s coming out are projects, not QB’s to come in and start IMO. Like I said, SF may be better with Kapernick.

Cook was tainted based on personality and teammate issues well before that game. Kaepernick hasn’t been a leader but Cook is not the answer.

Kiper has Cal qb Goff going to Cleveland with the second pick. Watched Goff play at Cal. He has a great arm, makes all the throws, pretty athletic. His stats are both gaudy and misleading: they always played from way behind, especially in his first 2 years, when Cal played no defense (still don’t) in Sonny Dyke’s system. Teams scored quickly and he padded his stats throwing on what seemed like every down.

The man of few words has spoken:

“I’m ready”

  • BeastMode