<p>Aah okay thanks, so you reckon like, reading one chapter in PR, and then reading the same chapter in Barrons (I mean, the chapter covering the same material?)… Sorry, I am getting a bit desperate.</p>
<p>EDIT: Aah! Thank you guys! I am generally good at maths (not so much reflected in my SAT I score though…) and I took Calculus in 10th grade or something, so I should sort of be able to do this, but a lot of the stuff in the book I really haven’t done at school, so I think I’ll just prepare with PR, and then read Barrons really quick when I have time to spare, and read over the harder parts in Barrons as well.</p>
<p>and btw, if you get higher than 720 on a timed Barron’s practice test you can notify your colleges of that they’ll receive an 800 from you shortly.</p>
<p>Hahaha! Thank you guys! I am really relieved! I had expected posts saying AAAH! ARE YOU INSANE! YOU NEED AT LEAST 3 MONTHS TO PREPARE! and that PR was much too easy, and Barrons was the only book close to matching the actual test! pfewwww!</p>
<p>@Bilguun- Thats VERY WRONG. I got 800s in half timed Barrons tests and 770 in the real thing :(( ANYTHING can happen on the test day.
I made tooooo many silly mistakes coz of my lungs o.O</p>
<p>Edit: On the contrary, you might get 700 on Barrons and 800 on the real thing. Lots of CCers say so.</p>
<p>Gary, well, assuming there are no unforeseen problems, a consistent 720+ on Barron’s is a 95.4% guarantee of an 800 on the real test.
I was topping 700 on Barron’s and the real test was a dance in the disco.</p>
<p>Its true, PR is easier I was scoring in the 780s and 790s consistently for Math 2 (I know that’s not awesome for you guys, but I was happy) Then I went for the test and time flies way faster during the test than if you were timing yourself at home and ended up with a 750. Ah whatevs.</p>
<p>@tetris - I used to think that too, but sometimes you have to separate personality. For example, I’d do Puck but I wouldn’t date him. LOL thats my reasoning and i’m sticking with it.</p>