<p>Do your two contrasting, contemporary monologues have to necessarily be “comedic” and “dramatic”. I have seven monologues prepared, but I really like two of them. The first one starts off light and has almost a comedic sense but changes towards the end to almost sadness. The other one is anger and sarcasm. Obviously, they are different parts of me but the first one is not necessarily “ha ha” funny. Is this still okay? Or do I have to do a comedic and dramatic piece.</p>
<p>Those sound like very reasonable contrasting monologues. From our experience, practically no good monologue is one-dimensional, whether it’s funny, sad, angry, etc. Also, don’t be surprised if they do not laugh at your comedic piece. Most likely they have heard it before, and they are interested in evaluating your performance, not in being entertained like an audience would.</p>
<p>My D found that many “comedic” monologues have a dark element, and that “serious” monologues don’t all have to be angry or upset. Many of them have a sweet element, just as the funny ones can be sad. The contrast between the two, meant to show your versatility and a variety in your interests, is what is important.</p>
<p>Good luck!</p>
<p>I’m a little worried about your using a monologue that is nothing but anger and sarcasm. Anger and sarcasm are two of the “easier” emotions. When I see an auditioner rely entirely on anger and sarcasm, I am not impressed at all. Many beginning actors discover anger and/or sarcasm, and then try to use these for all their roles.</p>
<p>It’s much more effective to try to find a monologue that portrays the character as being vulnerable. It’s much more difficult to play as well.</p>