<p>What do you think of his approach in his new book "Theatre"? It goes against the majority of theatre in history, and I wanted to get your thoughts on it.</p>
<p>Mamet is an iconoclast who likes to shake things up. In his other books, he slams Method acting.</p>
<p>I haven't read this one, but it sounds similar. Apparently he says that plays don't need directors. I don't think many people would agree with that.</p>
<p>Here is a link to a review I found.
Theatre</a> by David Mamet: review - Telegraph</p>