DD flushing winning lottery ticket down toilet!

<p>Originally Posted by jlauer95</p>

<h2>Strangely enuf, a few pages ago, I half-jokingly put forth this idea to the OP.</h2>

<p>Berurah: I actually thought you were seriously advocating this…there are many people (relatively speaking) around here who subscribe to this philosophy.</p>

<hr>

<p>The reason that I was half-joking is because I wasn’t sure how this could be really implemented at this time. </p>

<p>How can you convince enuf people to begin such a practice in a given area? </p>

<p>how can you convince people that this isn’t a sexist thing that is suggesting that women are sooo weak and stupid that they need a protective system. (I can’t help but think that many would accuse supporters of the latter.)</p>

<p>

Well, it IS a sexist thing. <strong><em>VERY</em></strong> You will find this practice used here primarily among certain kinds of VERY fundamentalist religious groups which promote from the outset (when the kids are wee ones) the concept of a patriarchal family structure, and they believe that this is wholly supported by the bible, which they tend to interpret in a literal way. This is NOT something that you could effectively “convince” people to do later on or if you have an even remotely “normal” American family structure. In effect, this HAS to be accomplished through some sort of intensive indoctrination or brainwashing. The couple that I know has six kids, and outside of the third one (the one rebel who confides in me…and even she is not THAT much of a rebel), they ALL adhere to this, though some of them are still young. But their 25-year-old is still living at home and has NEVER, to my knowledge, engaged in any kind of courtship/dating relationship with a man…it is the second oldest who got married last summer.</p>

<p>~berurah</p>

<p>def agree with berurah re. courting. The only college campuses where you will see courting are places like BJU, Patrick Henry, and PCC.</p>

<p>Berurah,</p>

<p>I have heard that some people do that - which is fine - to each his own! That really isn’t the case for the majority of people, though. I do worry that physicality too soon can impede the emotional development of the relationship - the evil that such measures are designed to guard against. That, and men using women for sex - oh wait, that’s what happens now! </p>

<p>The trick, then, is to find a better way to accomplish the same goals.</p>

<p>I actually LIKE the idea of courtship. IMO, it’s not a “You’re too stupid and weak to make your own decisions” system so much as a “You’re my daughter and you deserve men who will treat you well” system. Then again, Zeus (although he doesn’t know it!) screens my men. Generally, the men who don’t like a strong father-daughter relationship are horrible boyfriends. (“Horrible” is an understatement.) I now make sure to mention my dad sometime during the first few dates. Playing pool and he says I’m good? “Oh, thanks. My dad taught me to play when I was a kid.” </p>

<p>As Zeus also said, “Men can tell when other guys are scum. Girls have no idea.” Vice versa - women can always tell when other women aren’t worth anyone’s time, but men are happily oblivious. </p>

<p>Courting doesn’t require the patriarchy or the uber-old-fashioned idea that men should ask fathers before daughters. How about the simple idea that you should get to know someone on an emotional level before being physically involved and that parents (or other family) can have some valuable input? As much as I try not to, I find jerks. I, in my super-independent-career-woman adulthood, want familial approval of whomever I find. Yes, my family is crazy, insane, and dysfunctional - but they love me enough to not want to see me with a creep. They’re also (esp. my dad!) laid-back enough to not interfere unless there’s really an issue. My dad’s attitude is, “It’s your life.” (Followed by a shrug.) Doesn’t have to be a “father knows best” thing. Heck, it would be great for sons who tend to find themselves with women who aren’t the best of ladies to run their g/fs by their moms and sisters, who could probably tell in a heartbeat if she’s good for him.</p>

<p><<<< Well, it IS a sexist thing. <strong><em>VERY</em></strong> >></p>

<p>do you mean that they think women are stupid??? That is what I meant by sexist.</p>

<br>

<br>

<p>omigod… Is that true or what!!! LOL We gals can spot a phony plastic-boobed self-centered lazy vain chick a mile away while the guys are zoned into her 38’s.</p>

<p><<<<< How about the simple idea that you should get to know someone on an emotional level before being physically involved and that parents (or other family) can have some valuable input? >>>></p>

<p>I think that is the key… I know my single friends confess that once they get “physical” a LOT of the talking/sharing stops. The dates become dinner and the sack and then progress to TV and then the sack which then becomes TV & sex in the sack…</p>

<p>When my D briefly dated a creep it was her little brother who sniffed out his creepiness immediately.</p>

<p>

aries~</p>

<p>The type of courting I’m talking about DOES require that. Why is it necessary to relegate control over who you “select” to date to your father? That IS what courting is all about…relegating decisions such as this because you are not deemed capable of making them yourself as a young woman.</p>

<p>I am the perfect example of someone who was able to make good choices for myself. I was REPEATEDLY approached by others asking me how I “got guys to treat me so well.” Wine, roses, poetry, you name it–and the endless devotion to go with those things…I STILL have an overflowing portfolio of love poetry that would be hard to match, much of it written by an 18-year-old boy…</p>

<p>A woman CAN demand to be treated well. I did, and I WAS. And I still AM. :)</p>

<p>~berurah</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>Well, obviously they would not put it this way, but this is what it amounts to IMHO. The way they would put it is that women have certain “roles” and that a good woman will respect the confines of that role by NOT trying to make decisions that would be better left to a man, first the father, then the husband, who appropriately enough, are virtually the only two involved in the major decisions of the courtship <em>lol</em>.</p>

<p>~berurah</p>

<p>Berurah, it is important that both people, but particularly the women, be honest with themselves about whether it’s “sex” or “love.” Often, and perhaps often prompted by religious views, a woman well tell herself that she’s in love as a way to justify having sex. Some guys will do this too, but not as much. A woman needs to be honest with herself if she’s just having sex, whether casual or not so casual.</p>

<p>The issue arises again when some make the equivalence of “good sex” = “love” or “love” = “good sex,” neither of which is necessarily true.</p>

<p>Aries, you have a point about the interrelationship between “how soon?” and how durable a relationship. Two hours is almost certainly always too soon; otoh, I know someone who’s been married for 14 years and is hoping that next weekend will finally be “it.” (j/k)</p>

<p>Fwiw, your sister already knows that when she brings a b/f home, I will be sitting in the living room, calmly polishing my 17th-century Turkish saber while I interrogate him. This approach saves work. She won’t bring anyone home unless she’s really serious about him.</p>

<p>And fwiw again, TheMom would be a kindred spirit of yours: she always saw it as no big deal from a feminist point of view to make a battle over whether she kept her father’s last name or took her husband’s, one man’s or another; she chose to keep her maiden name.</p>

<p>I would not expect either my D or her intended to ask my “permission” to marry. I would hope that they would ask for my blessing. A distinction.</p>

<p>I don’t see a problem with the 12-15 relationships over a number of years except that, remembering back, I always managed to sabotage a few with the “if it’s not permanent then what’s the point of even getting started” approach. It needs to be approached with more equanimity, I think. To every season, etc., etc., etc., and I spent needless time in an emotional desert because I was too insecure to deal with relationships that had uncertainties in them. One of the few things I regret. Risk more, reward more.</p>

<p>We have attempted to brainwash…uh, I mean <em>teach</em>…our children that the type of courtship Berurah describes is a good way to form relationships. We know lots of families who “do” courtship, and they all do it differently.</p>

<p>Having the girl’s dad involved is a pretty consistent aspect of courtship. For most that we know though, it is subtly different than what Berurah describes. Yes, the guy is supposed to ask the dad if he’s interested in starting a relationship with the d. But it’s for the reasons that Ariesathena describes, not because she is too stupid to pick a guy for herself. </p>

<p>Men seem to be able to spot a guy whose motives are less than noble. A young girl/woman (not stupid…just young and inexperienced) will often fall for a guy who is a smooth operator. Maybe it’s a sexist thing to say, but you just don’t as often see young, inexperienced guys being taken in by smooth operator young women. So, if dad thinks the guy is trouble, he tells him to get lost. If he thinks the guy is okay, that he is interested in the d because he is looking for a wife rather than looking for a playtoy, and he thinks his d is ready, he tells his d and asks her if she’s interested. If she’s not, dad gets rid of him. If she is, dad gives the go ahead. </p>

<p>Since, generally speaking, courtships occur when young women are of age or close to it, she doesn’t have to have her dad’s permission. Rather, she asks him to be her screener because she trusts his judgment better than her own. She is also trusting him to protect her in things such as not getting started on a relationship when it will before years before there could be a marriage. Kids don’t turn into adults overnight just because they turn 18.</p>

<p>In our own family, our 21 y/o d said “thanks, but no thanks” to courtship. That’s her decision. We haven’t disowned her or penalized her in any way. Interestingly, though she didn’t embrace the courtship philosophy, her dating philosophy is much more conservative than average. She’s only dated 2-3 guys, though she gets asked out frequently. She’s very picky and makes sure she knows certain things about a guy before she’ll go out with him. She won’t go out with someone if she knows something about him up front that would make him someone she wouldn’t want to marry.</p>

<p>Our oldest S whined all through high school that we wouldn’t let him date. We homeschooled our kids, so it was relatively easy to prevent this. In his junior year he met a girl (also homeschooled) who he became good friends with and started to “like”. She wasn’t allowed to date either, so they spent time together working on a mock trial team, serving as officers in a club, talking on IM, and occasionally getting together with friends at one of our homes.</p>

<p>Now they are both attending the same university. They have, of course, spent time alone there and have grown closer. Her dad has told our s that they like him just fine, but they will not give them permission to date her at this time. Her family are conservative Christians, as are we, and they don’t want her dating someone for 3-4 years until graduation since we all know where that will likely end up. Yes, it’s been an up and down battle with them trying to stay away from each other and back the relationship down and then succumbing and seeing each other again. We know her parents and like them, but I think her dad is setting up a no-win situation, but that’s another long post. Like our d, this girl could tell her dad, “thanks, but no thanks” for the protection. However, she has decided not to do that. She really trusts her dad and wants to follow his advice. Our son, I am proud to say, has enough foresight that he knows it would not be wise to set himself up in opposition to her parents, so he is trying to honor her dad’s wishes, too.</p>

<p>Oh, and a little aside…I just have a real feeling that those 2 aren’t going to have a problem in the world with intimate compatibility if they wait until marriage. They formed their relationship so slowly…going from acquaintances to co-workers (kind of, on the mock trial and clubs) to friends to best friends to sweethearts over the course of 3 years. They knew and respected one another before they started looking all goofy at each other. Maybe I’m naive, but I think they’ll be just fine.</p>

<p>Anyway, all that to say, this relationship is clearly not a normal college kids’ relationship. However, in the long run, they are likely to have a much happier and more stable relationship than most. As for our s, he sees this girl as a prize worth winning and worth waiting for. She feels like a queen because he is willing to wait for her even though she is “so much trouble”.</p>

<p>Our younger s is 16. He knows he isn’t allowed to date, so he hasn’t said much about it. He’s watching his older siblings though, and I’m sure he’s learning more from them than anything we tell him.</p>

<p>I’m just another right-wing conservative…we put the “fun” back into fundamentalist!!</p>

<p>

LMAO!!! Why your 17th-century Turkish saber? Is it, perhaps, because you can’t quite muster up the Johnny Depp swordplay?</p>

<p>As for the last name… just call me “Aries Y.” Or Zed. Omega could be cool. “Aries Chi.” Hum… the possibilities are endless. </p>

<p>JLauer: SO TRUE. Ever wanted to smack a guy friend upside the head and say, “What you are thinking… with??”</p>

<p>Berurah: I guess we define courtship differently. I think there’s a difference between consent, veto power, and advice - pretty much in diminishing order of paternalism. I’m on the screener side - and should do that more often. I’m not looking for a veto or permission; I’m looking for another “pair of eyes” to ask whether the b/f is a good man or just in it to use me.</p>

<p>OK, I gave up on reading all the responses after page 2, but I did want to bring up one thing…sorry if somebody already did in the other 13 pages.
Your D might end up marrying this guy. Slim possibility, I know, but please be careful how you talk about him (lazy, not bright, etc). </p>

<p>This is coming from someone who married the “not so bright” guy and is still very happy 19 years later. OK, probably not what you wanted to hear. But I clearly remember some of the mean things my dad said about H. Just something to think about. </p>

<p>OTOH, I would encourage your D to at least try her “top tier” school for a year. Maybe after one year–if they are still together–you could agree to talk about it again.</p>

<p>Aries, manage to connect on your next trip to the coast and I’ll give you a lesson in Johnny Depp sword play. I have extra blades, masks, and jackets. Though it’s my <em>appearance</em> that most closely resembles Johnny Depp; my bladework is more like that of Inigo Montoya in THE PRINCESS BRIDE. Plus I can deliver the line “I do not think that word means what you think it does” with uncanny accuracy.</p>

<p>No, the Turkish saber is the best for intimidating. Stout hearts and true and all that. The acid etching is beautiful. But it’s not a weapon for use on foot; the weight is oddly balanced towards the tip of the blade, pulling it down, which is fine if your making a downward cut from upon horseback but awkward if facing an adversary on foot on level ground. Of course, the putative b/f wouldn’t know that unless he’d handled the blade and <em>that</em> is extremely unlikely to have happened until he was well on the way to joining the family.</p>

<p>As for another set of eyes, knowing that I likely won’t be present, I’ve told your sister to watch how a guy treats people he doesn’t have to be nice to: waitresses, sales or postal clerks, children, etc. A good first test of character.</p>

<p>Future scientists could have more insight into the parents of the early twenty-first century by reading through this thread than from any other original source. All of this is fascinating, and plotting the directions of how this thread has moved from the OP questions to the ■■■■■ question through various machinations from (starting to be) confessional to parental philosophy about how their kids should go through these life decisions makes for great reading.</p>

<p>And no matter how diverse the various approaches, it seems that all of them are “right” for each of the families. It all comes down to wanting our kids to be happy, safe, fulfilled, loved, and all of the other adjectival hopes we have for them.</p>

<p>But I was a little sad that the confessional part started to fizzle out… We could have learned some verrrry interrrresting things about the posters here. :)</p>

<p>Pass the wine and continue…</p>

<br>

<br>

<p>oh… See I didn’t look at it that way. I looked at it from the perspective that both sexes would benefit overall from the system. </p>

<p>“Courting” prevents a girl from becoming too attached to a “bad unstable match” by falling in love and then not being able to “see” the inadequacies because he’s nice or funny. (Girls do tend to be attracted to men who are “nice” to them.) and it prevents a boy from thinking that he doesn’t have to make sure that he is a “worthy” of being a “suitor” (which prevents them from slacking off and not having “direction”. God, how many of those have we met in our dating lives!!!).</p>

<p>AND, I don’t agree that only the men in the situation are making the decisions – moms and the girl are involved and no girl has to be courted by anyone that doesn’t interest her.</p>

<p>Aris: SO TRUE. Ever wanted to smack a guy friend upside the head and say, “What you are thinking… with??”</p>

<p>I know what they are thinking <em>with</em>… they are <em>thinking</em> with the head without a brain. ;)</p>

<p>

I apologize if I have offended you, timely. That was not my intent. I was trying to explain that if your kids live a quintessential “mainstream” life, as in public/private schools, etc., it would be very unusual for the family to practice the courtship philosophy. <em>EVERY</em> family <em>I</em> know who utilizes the courtship concept also homeschools, is heavily involved in a church, and adopts a VERY conservative Christian stance. When you homeschool and your kids spend the majority of their time with your or in a church of your choosing, it is much easier to encourage these sorts of unusual practices as your kids are not as freely exposed to the ideas/behaviors which you find inappropriate.</p>

<p>On a related note, I brainwash the HECK out of my kids…ALL the time. Nothin’ wrong with a little parental brainwashing, as long as the concepts stressed are healthy and functional ones, IMHO. ;)</p>

<p>~berurah</p>

<p>

digmedia, you SHOCK ME! And here I thought you were the type of person who would politely avert your eyes if we CC women went into “confession mode.” Wow…who wouda thunk it??? :o</p>

<p>~berurah</p>