<p>I've noticed that UT-Dallas' Dean's List is constructed by taking the top 10% of students (based on GPA) in a given semester. Most schools seem to have an arbitrary number, say 3.25, 3.5 or even 3.75 that is used to determine who makes the list.</p>
<p>I have never made the Dean's List (hoping this semester is the first)...but certainly would have made it quite a few times at other schools based on a set GPA requirement. </p>
<p>Which method is better...a benchmark GPA number or a "competition" against other students in your school of study?</p>
<p>Personally I like the 3.5 benchmark...possibly 3.75...those are high marks and should be recognized in some way. That's like being in high school...receiving an "A" average and not being on the honor roll. Of course this isn't high school, so one may throw that out of the proverbial window. I will say that UT-Dallas' method is more stringent and that being on our Dean's List is more of an accomplishment.</p>