<p>Hey Shark, as a rule of thumb, any question toward the end of a math section, will not have “the answer cannot be found with the given info” as an answer. This is just a trap, and most hard level questions won’t have that as an answer. Next time you are at the end of a section and see that as an answer choice, immediately cross it out.</p>
<p>According to college board, if you had the black-and-white test version in this order: math, reading, reading, math, reading, writing, reading, math, writing, it says section 6 is the equating section. Was that the one that had the passage about food/transportation and cows?</p>
<p>Do you guys think -5 could possibly be 750?</p>
<p>Has -3 EVER been 800? (I’m thinking not, just wondering…)</p>
<p>Ed, I agree with all of your math answers with confidence. </p>
<p>Also, I’m pretty sure that the answer to the one that asked for the difference of a-b (they were angles in a polar graph) was 27, because I got that a was 57 and b was 30.</p>
<p>"a) For the “privacy is hard to deal with today” response, I was going to put that, but where does it mention it in the passage? On the other hand, both the last half of passage 2 and the whole of passage 1 discuss the need for us to maintain our liberties, so I went for that one.</p>
<p>b) Again, for the hundreds of monitors question, I was going to put that, but then look at what those monitors are referring to: government-tapping into our systems, not the databasification that passage 2 so strongly supports (and which would, in turn, lend your answer as the correct one). So I had a feeling the answer to this would be, “that’s why we need government restrictions” (e, on my test, if i remember right). "</p>
<p>Oh, wait, I realized you are right about (B). I remember the question more clearly as “In reference to Passage 1’s 100 cameras or something, Passage 1 would argue:”</p>
<p>And in fact I did put “That the government does indeed need restrictions,” because it was talking about Orwell’s prediction etc. So we’re both right yay :)</p>
<p>But Idk about (a), I’m pretty sure about that answer because everything else seemed really off, and both passages do awknowledge the fact that technology undermines privacy. Passage 2 just says that this lack of privacy may actually beneficial.</p>
<p>“Do you guys think -5 could possibly be 750?”</p>
<p>That’s actually the score I recieved on my first SAT</p>
<p>^woo, that’s what I put for hundreds of monitors as well =).
I do have one qualm with you, though.
The question asked for the meaning of ‘tender’, not ‘lithe’.</p>
<p>cool nick I am pretty confident then…and ya a -5 could, with an excellent curve (which i don’t think we will have on this one anyway) be a 750…dont think anything lower than -2 will ever be perfect…</p>
<p>o i remembered another math…x-y=y-z=z-t=5 what is x-t its 15</p>
<p>what kind of score do you think -7 would be (no omissions, just incorrect)<br>
Could it be a 700?</p>
<p>^For math? -7 would be lower than 700. -3, my guess, would be 730-740.</p>
<p>I meant for Critical Reading -7</p>
<p>^700 or 710.</p>
<p>i sincerely hope -2 = 800 on CR this time around…</p>
<p>-7 on CR is more like 720</p>
<p>I don’t think I got any wrong on the writing section, yay! :D! Anyway, I seriously cannot wait until the results come out.</p>
<p>Heyy, what do you guys think will be an 800 on the math and critical reading sections?</p>
<p>Sorry if this is impossible to know, but you seem to kind of be predicting these numbers? I’m kind of new to this CC thing, so once again I apologize!</p>
<p>dnt worry about it. ur right; it is impossible to know. I know a little bit about this tho and this is my third time taking the test and my guesses were pretty close even the last two times and i would say that even 1 wrong will be less than 800 on math…critical reading is harder to say, but i would guess that 1 wrong will still be 800 but two wrong will be lower</p>
<p>I needed to post something so this thread would show up on the front page.</p>
<p>Post away!</p>
<p>Test scores come out really soon.</p>
<p>Merry Christmas!</p>