December 2008 sat

<p>^yes that’s what I got.</p>

<p>But for the CR, really? Critical of different institutions? That makes sense, but so does the one I put :(</p>

<p>I did not have that passage so that section must be experimental</p>

<p>I put critical of different institutions because one was critical of the goverment and the other of the private sector. I didnt put benefits because it also said the goverment taking privacy was bad.</p>

<p>same, i didn’t have that passage either, gahhh, making me nervous LOL >.<;
BUT how was your testing experience? I had a guy sit next to me, angle his body towards me, and shake/fidget his foot THROUGHOUT the TEST ARHhhhHhggh</p>

<p>i hope i did well…i think I only got 1 multiple choice wrong…wat did u guys get for the area of the paralleogram?</p>

<p>1360 gahhhh that was so wrong i bet</p>

<p>that test blew my mind. those last 3 sections were very difficult to concentrate on.</p>

<p>i put 1360 too yeahhh =)</p>

<p>yes! =) I had experimental sections 3/4. The critical reading passage from section 3 was terribly boring…so boring I don’t even remember the topic. Does anybody remember?</p>

<p>edit: now i remember, it was about the woman’s OCDness to record the “feeling” of events and how she can’t distinguish the realities and fantasies of her journalistic entries</p>

<p>When do we hear about the experimental section? I desperately hope it is section 4 CR, because I know I got a bunch of sentence completions wrong.</p>

<p>if the last fill in was eight, then my totally random guessing might of paid off… I got 7/3 as the slope…I plugged in the equation into my calculator and took two points and found the slope that way.</p>

<p>Yes i got 8 too.
I am positive its 8 considering i had 5 minutes left to do it and worked it out like for the whole time</p>

<p>7/3 was also the answer i got</p>

<p>wait the 8 and 7/3…was this an experimental math section? i dont remember a cube question…</p>

<p>To Author 1’s Idea that electronic moniters etc. would intrude privacy, how would Author 2 respond?</p>

<p>I put electronics would facilitate human life or something like that.</p>

<p>Anyone care to share?</p>

<p>Also, I believe there were two test versions. My friend and I had completely different reading passages for every section. BTW, I got a dummy reading section. Was it about a Korean mother?</p>

<p>Moreover, the answer for the cube question is 16. Because each surface comprises of 16 cubes, you have to subtract 64-16*4, but since the cubes at the corners are counted twice, you have to add back 16.</p>

<p>1360 is correct. I calculated it several different ways.</p>

<p>I had no idea what “marinet” meant, so I put toady.</p>

<p>Any other questions that troubled people?</p>

<p>but when you add back 16, you forget that you mistakenly “double” count the 8 corners of the cube. That would be 16-8 = 8</p>

<p>The unpainted cubes answer was definitely 8</p>

<p>and the CR question “To Author 1’s Idea that electronic moniters etc. would intrude privacy, how would Author 2 respond?” </p>

<p>I’m almost completely sure that the answer was that Author 2 would say that it would benefit business</p>

<p>How many of you took the SAT with extended time?</p>

<p>the cube question was experimental
i didnt have it</p>

<p>I dont remember the parrallelogram question, can anyone remind me what it was about?</p>