<p>yes toady is correct. Toady is defined as someone who is a sycophant who attempts fawn over every one around them.</p>
<p>Yes, they were 7/3 and 8. For the cube one, at first I put 16, but went back and changed it, after time was called. (I know I’m bad, but I heard everyone goes back)</p>
<p>For the privacy one, what was the answer to the second to last question? It was something about what do both passages agree on or something?</p>
<p>Yeah, I got the Korean mother one. It was really easy.</p>
<p>Overall, I think I did pretty well. Last time I got 2160. This time I’m almost 100% sure I beat 2200. I’m surprised everyone thinks it was super hard. Maybe I’m just completely wrong and failed???</p>
<p>On my version, the cube question was definitely NOT experimental. I had four critical reading sections, so probably either the second or third one is experimental. My test order was really weird. First was the essay, then math, reading, reading, math, writing, reading, reading, math, writing.</p>
<p>Good luck to everyone, even though it’s a little late…</p>
<p>thats so weird i swear i didnt have a cube question. does anyone want to explain teh problem more in depth</p>
<p>Sorry, this is from a few pages ago, but I agree with hipster about the last CR section on privacy. For the question asking about the relationship between the two passages, I put that passage 1 lists the negatives and passage 2 lists the benefits. The other answer choice also makes sense…about the two passages being critical of different institutions…so I’m not really sure which one is correct? Anyone else?</p>
<p>I’m still ambivalent about that question myself.</p>
<p>umm some people on here really bother me… is it really necessary to boast about your high ambitions and/or previous test scores? i mean, it’s totally fine to say it once or something, but i’ve counted several posts from certain people saying it over and over to the point at which it gets irritating. so i’ll say it once AND ONLY ONCE. i am pretty confident that i got a 2400 on this SAT. </p>
<p>and with regards to the last question on the 2-paragraph privacy CR section, it was definitely the “differing institutions” one. the first one feared computers and other electronic devices that cryptically store information (ie credit card info, personal information, etc.), whereas the second one primarily lamented the future with a domineering, omnipotent government’s that surveys its entire population.</p>
<p>^ you’re being facetious or serious, but I can’t tell.</p>
<p>I also think I got a 2400 or came close. If I missed a W question, it’s going to come down to my essay. Otherwise I’m solid.</p>
<p>I wouldn’t call the second paragraphs admonition of government power “critical.” I’d say it was cautious or worried, but the majority of the passage was about the benefits of public info.</p>
<p>SIGHSIGHSIGH</p>
<p>lolcats, you enjoy spiting me. </p>
<p>btw, my experimental section was in CR. did anyone else have the passage on rug-making? if not then i’m assuming that was the experimental. i would be very sad if so, however, since that was by far the easiest passage. i’m sure that the privacy and korean mother’s hands passages were not experimental, seeing as so many people have questions about/have mentioned them. but i haven’t heard anything about the gardening passage either (the one that mentions Thoreau and Emerson). did anyone else get that (who didn’t have an experimental in CR)?</p>
<p>also, does anybody remember the gist of a sentence completion question (and the answer choices) that had the options “uncouth” and “cursory”? my friend and i are intensely arguing about that one, but i cannot for the life of me remember any of the other choices or even the sentence. all i remember is that those were two of the options. if anyone can remember either the answers, their thoughts on the correct answer, or the gist of the sentence, i would greatly appreciate it :]</p>
<p>freakchild is right. the cube question was def. not experimental since i had mine in CR. </p>
<p>here’s how you should look at it:</p>
<p>there’s a 4x4x4 cube with red paint on all surfaces right? you’re cutting it into 64 1x1x1 cubes. the cubes with paint on them will be those on the surface only. so if you think about them in layers, there are 4 layers of 16 1x1 cubes (16*4 = 64). look at two of the faces and immediately eliminate 32 (two full layers of 16) from the total 64. now you have to eliminate the cubes that lie in between those two layers on the other two faces. since cubes wrap around the edges of faces, you can only eliminate cubes that lie in between the two remaining faces. so you can eliminate another two rows of 4 from both sides, subtracting 16 more from our reduced total of 32. now we look at the top and bottom faces. we’ve already gotten rid of all the cubes on the edge of the top and bottom surfaces, leaving us with the 4 located in the center of both faces. thus, we subtract 8 more from our even more reduced total of 16, leaving us with a grand total of only 8 cubes that DO NOT have red paint on any surface. in other words, these are the only 8 cubes that did not have any side exposed to the outsides of the cube. </p>
<p>i hope that helped despite how abstract my descriptions may have sounded without any visuals :</p>
<p>Ugh, I said cursory, but I looked up uncouth, and it is indeed uncouth. Like it was about the guest being rude during the hosts party or something.</p>
<p>Flipper I didn’t have that question, it might have been the experimental…</p>
<p>i really really hope so. i remember crossing out uncouth >.> </p>
<p>drat that might ruin my chance at the perfect score. :(</p>
<p>I’m worried about the parallel and perpindicular one with angels. I got it to be A) and equal to only 1…</p>
<p>dang, I missed that question because I thought it was asking for the cubes that had red paint on them…(bangs head on the wall). Oh well, now I really love super scoring 
Hope I didn’t make these kinds of mistakes elsewhere. Also, am I the only one having a hard time filling out the bubbles in the right section? Always on the writing multiple choice, I start filling out bubbles in the previous section once i get past question 24. Caught myself early this time, but last time I only realized this when I had already bubbled out 10 questions (thus, leaving me with less the preferable amount of time on the last 5 questions)…</p>
<p>I screwed up once with bubbling. When I switched from a reading to a math I started to bubble in 25… But deleted it. And it did it like 3 or 4 times…</p>
<p>was it just me… or were there like many versions of the Dec. SAT test? my friend and I had completely different math sections as well as reading sections.</p>
<p>for the compare passages one, why wasn’t it the one where the two passages “disagree in intensity but propose similar plans of actions”</p>