"Destroy America" -- H.S. teacher fired for assignment

<p>You have literally never heard the term “cultural Catholic” before? Wow. Just wow. I know you say you were reared Catholic, but it seems odd to me that a lifelong Catholic is as far out of the loop as you’ve professed to be about different things. It’s quite a common term both in and out of the church. There’s even a Catholic publication actually called The Cultural Catholic.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>Catholicism as a culture is particularly pertinent to those of us who were reared in areas with a high Catholic presence. Many of our habits, behaviors, traditions, even thoughts, are shaped by our Catholic heritage and we retain those even after leaving the Church. </p>

<p>I would suggest that as someone who never left the Church, HH, you are not very well-equipped to tell people who have how they should feel after having done so. Also, you seem singularly prone to hang offensive and often inaccurate labels on people. Simply put, you aren’t the best person to dictate to former Catholics what they should call themselves. </p>

<p>If they feel they are recovering from something negative, it’s not your place to judge them. You don’t know what their experiences were in the church, and you’ve never been in the position of leaving it. Many of those who call themselves “recovering Catholics” (I never did) do so in bittersweet recognition of how difficult it is to break away from what was their Mother, the Church, and the rich cultural and spiritual heritage that goes with it. (And others, like lealdragon, use the term for other, equally valid reasons that she’s already expressed).</p>

<p>And by the way, HH–given the fact that it’s already been demonstrated that I still know the order of Mass better than you do–perhaps you should stay away from trying to tell me what as a former Catholic I do and don’t understand about the church.</p>

<p>“I can (if you were really interested) show you HUNDREDS of Muslim organizations, agencies, scholars, and imams who quite publicly condemned the events of 911,”</p>

<p>in the Land of Oz no doubt</p>

<p>Apologies to Dylan: “We all wear the same thorny crown.”</p>

<p>CNN every week has on numerous Muslim scholars. religious officials, and other ordinary Muslims - ALL CONDEMNING THE VIOLENCE - oh right the “violence” of Israel, America, and Bush -sometimes couched in the terminology “we condemn ALL violence” after for example the 619th sucide bomber blows up another pizza shop or bus stop in Israel </p>

<p>The mega-television networks like CNN, ABC, NBC, CBS AND BBD have made it very clear they have chosen sides</p>

<p>“…chosen sides”</p>

<p>Which side? huh?</p>

<p>People who think violence is ok are often so entrenched in an ‘us against them’ mentality that they have a hard time understanding that someone could actually be against ALL violence.</p>

<p>No doubt some in WW2 would have preferred the United States and Great Britain to just lay down their arms against the NAZIS - as everyone knows the Brits and Americans fought back using extreme VIOLENCE</p>

<p>Being in against “all violence” is very convenient sometimes</p>

<p>Citation, you miss the point.</p>

<p>Self-defense is an entirely different issue than aggressive attack. Bush sold his war on the premise of self-defense, but it was NOT Iraq who attacked us! Therefore, it was an aggressive attack. Now Cheney is talking about attacking Iran. Where does it end?</p>

<p>Christianity has failed, imo. 2000 years ago, Jesus told his disciples ‘All these things I do, you shall do also’ meaning the healing of the sick, the raising of the dead, the turning the other cheek.</p>

<p>Where are the people healing the multitudes? Where are the people truly living according to Jesus’ teachings?</p>

<p>Yes, there are some isolated incidents, like Mother Theresa, Ghandhi, and some of the spirit-filled preachers who lay hands on people and they are healed…but we’re not seeing it on a wide scale.</p>

<p>Perhaps if violence as a means of solving problems were no longer acceptable, then we’d find better ways to solve problems.</p>

<p>The world can no longer afford to resolve conflicts thru violence. There is too much at stake - like the very survival of the human race and the planet itself.</p>

<p>The US should be a leader in promoting nonviolent means of negotiating, not a leading aggressor.</p>

<p>My husband is a martial arts instructor. The Chinese have an adage ‘There is every reason to know how to fight, but no reason to ever have to.’</p>

<p>The highest form of martial art is to not ever fight at all.</p>

<p>You didn’t answer my question about the news networks supposedly ‘choosing sides.’ What are you implying?</p>