<p>I haven’t been here for a long time, but I remembered all the wisdom in the Parent Cafe so I decided to post my question here. I would like some of your opinions on an insurance claim for an ER visit that was rejected, leaving me with a bill for $600. </p>
<p>The story:</p>
<p>I woke up with urinary symptoms: particles in urine, which led to difficulty+pain when urinating. I took some samples to examine myself, and while things improved after a few hours, the change was not that significant. I was worried that it could be a sign of a kidney stone about to pass/passing, or some other serious urinary problem. I was concerned that if I ignored this, I could wake up later unable to urinate, and that would be a bad situation. </p>
<p>Since my school’s health center was closed for the weekend, I called up and advice nurse, who told me to go to the ER. My symptoms were troubling, and I thought it would be prudent to see a doctor in case it develops into something serious. So I went. </p>
<p>Fortunately, things quickly improved during my ER visit. By the time I produced a sample at the hospital things seemed more or less normal, and indeed the lab tests came back normal. (Later, it turns out my symptoms were caused by some benign thing.)</p>
<p>This week I received a letter from my insurance company, and they did not cover my ER visit because emergency benefits don’t apply to visits for minor illnesses. They define emergency as whatever a reasonable person believes would jeopardize health, cause death, cause dysfunction of any organ, etc. Now, although my symptoms turned out to be nothing serious, at the time I really thought they warranted seeing a doctor urgently. I didn’t want to wait until it became a really painful kidney stone or anything like that. I didn’t think insurance companies were allowed to reject a claim for an ER visit for something that turned out to be nothing.</p>
<p>Do you think I could make a case that a reasonable person would do the same thing? </p>
<p>One thing that might complicate my situation is my doctor’s notes. After reading them, I realized that when I mentioned my self-samples to the doctor, he apparently took that to mean that my symptoms improved throughout the day. This is misleading, but it’s too late now. I wonder if the people at my insurance company saw that and concluded that I went to the ER for something that was already known to be not serious. I don’t know how much information they have access to.</p>
<p>Is there a decent chance that an appeal letter would change their decision? If so, what should I include in the letter? Should I mention details including my home urine samples, though I have no proof of them? Should I try to wait longer next time something like this happens? </p>
<p>I’d really appreciate any advice or opinions on this. Thanks in advance. </p>
<p>– Troubled Student</p>