<p>I rarely read a thread on this board with more interest than I read this one. I am really rather surprised by all of this. Really and truly. I have been told by several people on this board that they have applied to our institution simply because they found my posts kind and (hopefully) insightful.</p>
<p>Perhaps here is where that reputation ends. The word “fair” will never be used in the arts. There is no such thing. Is it fair that the student from rural somewhere had an instructor in English who directed one musical a year is up for the same position as the student who has taken four years of acting, seven years of dance, two years with a voice teacher, two years at Stagedoor Manor and two at Interlochen? </p>
<p>We are now seeing students with $1000 headshots, professionally designed resumes, audition coaches and agents. We also see students with no headshot, never been in a reasonable semblance of a play and don’t understand the first thing about how to begin to choose a monologue or a song. That isn’t fair. </p>
<p>The world of theatre is about connections. (Notice I did not say "it’s about who you know!) We connect with people. It is the very heart and soul of the interaction on stage between actors and actors to audience. I am friendly with a few of these coaches. We have made offers to some of their students. But we have also made offers to two students who did not have headshots. </p>
<p>There seems to be an assumption here that having the coach speak to me, or sit in on the dance audition, will sway how anyone casts a class. I speak from a very safe place: That will not happen. The coach will not be asked to teach the student for four years, nor will they have to cast them, and bring them to a place that makes them viable in the world of professional theatre. The school does that and not every school takes the same type of student. We all see talent and ability in different ways and with different students. No coach is going to change that. Too much is at stake. And to be perfectly frank, anyone with any success in the business has found that success because they have trusted their own instincts and gone with those instincts. That won’t change because this person or that person coached a potential student.</p>
<p>I don’t recall who said it, but they were dead on. I know if at least a handful of schools who will not even consider students who have certain coaches. If you want unfair… I would consider that to be unfair. The student does not know that simply putting down the name of Coach A will disqualify them from a school they have always dreamed they would attend. But there again, nobody ever said this is fair. </p>
<p>Do I think it is right for that coach to sit in on the group dance auditions? I’m not sure why it would matter. The combination will change from audition to audition, you can’t help the dancer by sitting there and in the end, the instincts of the casting directors will be the only thing that matters. </p>
<p>I tell students time and time again. The day you leave your undergraduate school is the last day that the name of the school matters. When you get into the audition it is the talent and the training that get you the role, not where you went to school. Will going to BIG SCHOOL get you into the door? Maybe. If the casting director went to that school it might get you into the door, but it will never get you the role. </p>
<p>I’ll leave you with this. We allow nobody in the room except those being cast and those doing the casting. Truth is difficult in a large group. The more people you know there, the more difficult it becomes. Coaches, parents, friends, etc are all politely asked to leave because we want to cast the best students for our program. The best way to do that is to see your best work.</p>