Group Think? Are we offering solid advice? Are we being influenced too much by rankings?

Good thing no one here does that with Michigan. :sunglasses:

Re: “White, heterosexual, cisgender, Protestant” students

Actually, there seems to be a definite tendency among posters not to include HBCUs in suggestion lists unless the student is known to be Black. I.e. it is assumed by most posters that White and other non-Black students would not be fine at a mostly-Black school that most HBCUs are.

I get the feeling that posters also may be hesitant to recommend HBCUs to students who have identified themselves as Black, unless the student themselves has put some of these schools on their list.

2 Likes

Speaking just for myself, I did need my horizons expanded. And considering ABCDEF U helped me do that. Every time somebody suggested a school I checked it out, even if I had never heard of it, or even when I thought I knew it was “all wrong.” It helped open my mind to a wider range of schools, and my mind needed that.

6 Likes

But as you said in the first few sentences of your post, many, many posters like you have been reading the forum for a long time, and many more are likely to be lurkers who do not post at all. So like you, many, if not most posters have been doing their research and HW here and elsewhere for a while, and by the time they post, even if it is their first post, repeating the same old, same old that they have read multiple times in multiple threads may provide little benefit. What is more likely a benefit is to answer the poster’s specific questions that they ask.

Alabama! If I see Alabama recommended one more time for every kid :crazy_face:

1 Like

One of my thoughts vis a vis groupthink is that the importance of “rigor” is over-stated. Students should take a reasonably rigorous schedule but you don’t need to max out APs or take AP calc to get into a very selective school.

8 Likes

Agree that you don’t need a dozen plus APs like I have seen some students do, but re AP Calc, that depends upon the intended major. For most STEM majors, it’s pretty important.

2 Likes

S24s close friend just got into Dartmouth as a prospective science major without any calc at all. He went for AP stats after pre-calc instead. He also had fewer APs in general. Unhooked.

3 Likes

I do not have an Alabama issue, but I find it interesting that people are able to suggest colleges to students on a regular basis without having enough information from the OP to make recommendations at all.

I agree - take a hardish schedule, be involved, have a strong application, get A’s, submit scores if strong. That is the winning strategy. Pretty difficult to do for most. One less AP is a good strategy IMO.

1 Like

Sure, but I don’t think individual anecdotes to the contrary constitute good advice.

If a student is going into math, engineering, CS, or sciences like Physics, and AP Calc is available at the school, it’s a mistake to avoid taking it.

8 Likes

As an engineering major way back when, my highschool didn’t offer calculus, so my highest math was called “advanced math”, which is basically pre-calculus. About 20 of us freshman year in engineering college had to take accelerated calculus, which crammed 3 semesters of calc into 2. I do NOT recommend that for anyone that can avoid it. My take is that while you might get admitted without calc, like I was, it’s best to get calc in if you’re going the STEM route.

How about if we stipulate the above, which seems like common sense. However, if a kid has history, psychology, social work, classics etc etc etc as a direction, they do not need calculus. If they want to take it, great! But, in my opinion, if they don’t want to take it, it’s fine.

5 Likes

My two cents is it is very useful to distinguish hard rules from what I would call rules of thumb. This could also be called the distinction between a requirement and a recommendation.

When it comes to course selection, I think a few things can be hard rules/requirements (depending on the college), but most things are more rules of thumb/recommendations. And with the latter, I think the basic mindset should be something like to follow the rule of thumb/recommendation–unless you have a good reason not to.

And good reasons are not necessarily vanishingly rare. Obviously sometimes the recommended course in question isn’t even an option. Sometimes there are conflicting recommendations and you have to make a trade off. Sometimes there are special circumstances like a teacher you have good reasons to want to avoid. And so on.

Anyway, I personally think having that distinction in mind can help guide these discussions in productive ways.

2 Likes

I agree that kids should take rigorous course load within reason. However, what I’m coming to realize that having a strong “story” is often as important as academics as long as you have “good enough” rigor.

8 Likes

And if they decide they need calculus, they can take it in college.

2 Likes

That’s a deep issue but I am inclined to agree.

The way I would put it, some people seem to have this sort of model in their head of highly selective holistic review admissions where there is some ideal candidate who checks all the boxes and would score 100 points, and then you as an actual applicant get point deductions for anything you are missing or is otherwise non-ideal, but you try not to slip below whatever point cutoff they will be using for admissions.

We know from what these AOs say that is wrong. It is wrong from the start because they do not have one sort of candidate they are looking for, they actually want to put together a mix of different students who they think will interact to their mutual benefit in their college community.

And in that context, once you clear a certain academic threshold–admittedly a high one for the most selective colleges, but not so high that they don’t have many applicants who meet that standard for every one they can admit–they shift to asking how you as an individual might participate in that community, how you will benefit, what you will give in return, and so on. And to actually get admitted, you need to stand out to them in some way that a committee of people finds compelling.

So yeah, at that point your story as you put it is going to dominate. And that story is a bit backward-looking, but also forward-looking–you need in some way to convince them that choosing you rather than the other applicants they also deemed good enough academically will help them create the sort of complex, interactive community they are targeting.

OK, so to bring this back to the topic at hand, to the extent the collective advice we give ends up in practice implying to some kids that everyone should be doing all the same things to try to get admitted to the most selective colleges, we know in some sense that must be wrong. To be sure, they need to make sure they will pass that academic threshold, but beyond that it really becomes a question of helping them find a way to stand out as someone who will be seen by one or more great colleges as the sort of person they really want as part of the class they are making. And that has to be an individual journey by nature, it cannot be a formula or checklist or so on that everyone must follow.

1 Like

It’s an interesting comment because there is a thread now with a student who is in BC as a Junior, has named a few top schools they are interested, and is not planning to take the next level of calc as a Senior even though it’s offered.

Most of the opinions are you need to take it - for the rigor - because top schools will expect to see that. Other opinions are - you’ve taken Calc BC - you’ll be fine.

No one can 100% say what is the right answer - but - it gives the OP differing opinions to think about themselves - and perhaps than further discuss with a HS counselor, college admission person - or to even with parent/student discussing potential pros and cons.

That’s what’s great about these threads - a variety of perspectives that hopefully will help OP in their thought process.

It is a fine line, and the idea is for students to make course choices that keep as many doors open as long as possible while also taking classes that appeal to them. Calculus has become an important measure of rigor at many colleges. Not all schools give us the data though.

Wesleyan, which has a pretty high proportion of non-STEM majors, reported that 85% of their Class of 2027 admits had calculus in HS. That tells me they value calculus regardless what an applicant states their likely major is. I expect a large proportion of the 15% of admits who didn’t take calculus didn’t have that option at their HS. If only other schools were this transparent.

With that said, many admissions people are acutely aware that there are calculus access issues, and other schools have taken the time to understand if calculus is really necessary in HS for certain majors. Andy Borst had some good twitter threads about this when he was in UIUC admissions (now at UGA):
https://twitter.com/AndyBorstUGA/status/1575872338817478661

https://twitter.com/AndyBorstUGA/status/1603132427458732035

I agree. Sort of think, however, more OP’s ask because they know the odds of the A, for them, are slim. I also think that overreaching in AP’s does more damage than good for most kids. I see 3 AP’s junior and senior year with A’s and a great package as someone who does far better than 5 AP’s junior and senior year with a couple B’s. Not disagreeing, but that is my experience.

1 Like