<p>I have mixed feelings on immigration issues. I can take various points of view around the circumference, and I won’t pretend that I’ve developed an answer for every problem to my own satisfaction. In that, it appears I have plenty of company, both with posters here and with members of Congress.</p>
<p>I used to consult to the INS (before it separated into two organizations under Homeland Security) and among other activities, I conducted a broad study of IT applications and resources across INS (including Detention & Deportation, Investigations, Fraud, Border Patrol, Asylum, Adjudications, etc.), starting with interviews about the business concerns of the associate and assistant commissioners. Took the Border Patrol tour, went out at night with an agent to observe the levee and other areas of the border where illegals cross, learned how smuggling cases were handled, and so on and so forth. In short, I learned quite a bit (such as that more than 40% of men incarcerated for violent and drug-related crime in the late 1980s were illegals, for instance). </p>
<p>As a result of these experiences with the people on the ground and the summary perspectives of those running the show, I became more conservative in my views on “illegal migration.” This term is more descriptive of the problem than “illegal immigration” because many who come here do not wish to become citizens, they just want the jobs and their bite of the apple. Quite a bit of the money earned gets sent out of the country, tax evasion is rampant (according to Investigations, some cultures believe that they should not have to pay taxes at all, here or elsewhere) In sum, there are many illegal migrants who do not “add lasting value” to the US by their presence, and I do not think that those individuals should be allowed to enter, or if already here, to stay.</p>
<p>My own views have evolved as follows: I think of a “country” as a combination of three factors - a geographic boundary (contiguous or not), a system of government, and a set of natural and financial resources. The US was founded by immigrants, and the “give me your tired, your poor, your huddled masses…” principle was both a worthy and compassionate ideal and also necessary for the growth of the country for many years. IMO, that time has passed, and a new paradigm must be developed. The resources of the US are not unlimited. The numbers of the tired and the poor grow every day around the globe. The populace and the government that it elects should recognize these facts. We simply cannot care for every person on the planet, nor should we try to do so. Human suffering is like the grains of sand on the beach - you cannot count the miseries, and you can only do so much to alleviate them - you cannot make an end to human suffering. It is wishful thinking to pretend otherwise. </p>
<p>I don’t think that it is necessary to become as strict as Australia or New Zealand, but I believe it would be useful to place much more stringent limits on the number of unskilled adults we accept AND give more attention to the means to keep others out of the country. I also think that we need to change the rule about citizenship being automatically granted to those who are born here - the Border Patrol agents told me that there were many many women crossing the border in their last month of pregnancy. They had their babies free of charge in a US hospital, the baby was then a citizen, and the mother could immediately go on the dole, then send for her husband. Just one example of the many schemes that some illegal migrants engage in to survive off of the (relative) largess of public assistance in the US. </p>
<p>However - if we turn to the other side of the coin, demand for cheap labor, we find that, as other posters have mentioned, it is the corporations and agribusiness that creates the demand, and we are all complicit in it because we enjoy our current standard of living - their profits, our convenience. We should all be brave enough to face this selfish desire, and the consequences that it entails, and I believe we should honestly feel the shame of it. We may collectively wring our hands about the plight of poor and homeless US citizens, but this government, elected by us, has STILL not increased the minimum wage, and continues to cut resources for the needy. We don’t care effectively for our own citizens, and yet we allow ourselves to be overrun with unskilled illegals. The current administration’s posture is not, in my view, what is best for the US, but once again a perversion of what the founders meant by “for the people” for the purposes of political expediency. </p>
<p>If I were in Congress and proposing legislation about illegal migration and related matters, it would include the following: more strict immigration limits; better tax enforcement; enhanced border controls; more stringent deportation enforcement; beefed up employer sanctions; a higher minimum wage; affordable health care; and an honest leveling with the US populace about the positive and negative consequences - higher prices, less choice of goods, but a more moral and just society, and a higher standard of living for those who are currently exploited. This would, in turn, lower the crime rate and indirectly lower illegal drug use, often the refuge of those who despair. </p>
<p>In addition, I’d advocate that the US put much more pressure on second and third world countries to promote (gasp!) birth control, and allocate dollars to support that. Overpopulation is the often unmentioned root cause of most of these problems. And that leads into the taboo subject of how much harm religion can cause, and…I’ll stop here lest everyone flame me at once.</p>