Imus blast away

<p>What a silly article.</p>

<p>These girls never, ever even heard of 66 year old Don Imus.</p>

<p>And now they’re “nappy headed hoes of Rutgers.” For life."</p>

<p>Absolutely absurd.</p>

<p>You know, if Al Sharpton called my kids “greasy haired blubber-a**** white boys,” I think we would laugh our heads off. Consider the source.</p>

<p>But then I’m not raising my kids to be victims.</p>

<p>The people who blew this up into a major story (for their own agendas) are the ones really and truly responsible for harming these girls.</p>

<p>The more publicity they get–going on Oprah, etc.–the greater the chances that they will be messed up for life. And there will be a lot more people to blame for that than Imus.</p>

<p>These girls will be “nappy-headed hoes for life” only if they let themselves be.</p>

<p>It’s a shame Imus couldn’t have been quietly fired and the whole thing let go at that.</p>

<p>Hereshoping–You and I come from different political spectrums, but I must say that I heartily agree with your post #241. Especially your comment that “the people who blew this up into a major story are the ones truly responsible for harming these girls.” Absolutely, and we all know who they are. Imus was wrong; the people behind the subsequent media circus are far worse.</p>

<p>I do, however, disagree with you regarding Limbaugh and O’Reilly (from an earlier post). Clearly, one’s view of them has much to do with one’s political bent. I find Limbaugh a sometimes entertaining, often laughably outrageous buffoon who, unfortunately, preys on the uneducated and/or uninformed. Anyone with a molecule of brain matter sees him for what he is. … O’Reilly, on the other hand, is far more dangerous because he actually IS a smart guy, who tries very hard–and rather successfully, in some circles–to portray himself as “reasonable” and “moderate,” when, in fact, he’s anything but. … Keith Olbermann is a liberal counterpoint to O’Reilly and I can see where he would seriously get on some conservative nerves, though I enjoy his almost weekly “O’Reilly as worst-person-in-the-world” rant. </p>

<p>Ironically, Imus was one of the few broadcasters (vile insults aside), who walked a middle path. He’s a registered Republican with some serious conservative leanings, but also able to support people who don’t share all of his views. Like John Kerry. Imus liked him, endorsed him, then made merciless, wicked fun of him.</p>

<p>Another take on this on LaShawn Barber’s blog</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>LaShawn Barber is an African American Blogger. And the Jason Whitlock piece is also a different perspective</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>He is also African American. </p>

<p>so it seems that there is much disagreement on the reaction/over-reaction of this Imus thing.</p>

<p>Personally, I have never listened to him, in fact had never heard of him, but after listening to some of the quotes from his show over the past few days, there were many things said that, to me, seemed worse than the “nappy whatever” quote, yet he still had commercial backing and big time politicos appearing on his show. Where was the outrage then? He just seems like a jerk to me, and it is high time he lost his sponsors, but it should have been because he was discovered to be a jerk a long time ago.</p>

<p>I don’t know, Hindoo–I don’t think O’Reilly is really that smart, and his attempt to be a “moderate” is really transparent. I actually think Limbaugh is much more intelligent.</p>

<p>I agree, Ag65–Imus should have been gone years and years ago. Instead, he was given more and more legitimacy in the political world. I never could understand why. The people who enabled his rants and the people who knew better but still went on his show are just as tainted, imo.</p>

<p>Hereshoping:</p>

<p>You hit the nail on the head! (Post #241)</p>

<p>For some raeson, I keep hearing the school yard chant: “Sticks and Stones may break my bones, but names will never hurt me”… :rolleyes:</p>

<p>Maybe it is too politically incorrect now?</p>

<p>“He just seems like a jerk to me, and it is high time he lost his sponsors, but it should have been because he was discovered to be a jerk a long time ago.”</p>

<p>Probably was.</p>

<p>Sticks’n’stones only takes you so far. Imagine your son or daughter worked for, oh, 8-10 years, and despite any adversity along the way, to reach the pinnacle of wherever his or her dreams, hard work, and talent carried them. And after those 8-10 years, they received national recognition and they, and you, felt very proud.</p>

<p>Nothing that could be said, as the Rutgers coach made very clear, could ever take away that pride. BUT, whenever you remember that event, or your friends remember that event, or the public remembers that event, or your son and daughter remember thate vent, along with it will come the filth that came out of Don Imus’ mouth, and conveyed to millions. Nothing you can do will ever erase that memory; forever your joy in your son’s or daughter’s accomplishments – which can never be erased – will be accompanied by the trash that gave this nice man a cheap thrill in the early morning.</p>

<p>It seems that the only one who DID get broken bones was the Governor of New Jersey. Poor man. He truly was hurt by this.</p>

<p>Hereshoping–Is there something wrong with me that I actually enjoyed listening to Imus? I’m starting to feel that way, after reading posts by people I generally respect. I never took his rants seriously, though maybe I should have. He was a good interviewer, with interesting guests, so his insulting gibberish is something I just shrugged off. … Maybe he did have too much legitimacy in the political world, but I still enjoyed certain aspects of his program. Me bad.</p>

<p>By the way, Deirdre Imus’s non-toxic “Greening the Cleaning” all-purpose, environmentally friendly cleansing product is wonderful.</p>

<p>“Nothing that could be said, as the Rutgers coach made very clear, could ever take away that pride. BUT, whenever you remember that event, or your friends remember that event, or the public remembers that event, or your son and daughter remember thate vent, along with it will come the filth that came out of Don Imus’ mouth, and conveyed to millions.”</p>

<p>Funny mini the same thing could be said about the Duke LAX case. Those kids were headed for a national championship game and now a year and $3 million in legal fees later they are still permanently labeled white trask racist jocks, and you were leading the charge.</p>

<p>I certainly feel sorry for the Rutgers girls. They didn’t deserve the trashing Imus gave them and you are right it will follow them. I am happy though that the public had an opportunity to hear these young women and their coach because it made it clear just how unlike the Imus slur these kids really are. In fact they do represent all that is good in college sports and have made their parents, fellow students, and citizens of new Jersey proud.</p>

<p>“Funny mini the same thing could be said about the Duke LAX case. Those kids were headed for a national championship game and now a year and $3 million in legal fees later they are still permanently labeled white trask racist jocks, and you were leading the charge.”</p>

<p>Not funny at all. I think the environment they kept, their relationships with their neighbors, and the quality of the company they paid to keep were (and still are) despicable. And I think it is even more despicable to compare the Rutgers women to them. If you have information to back up the slur, I’d love to hear it.</p>

<p>I really know nothing about the Rutgers women. I don’t know if they drank, hired strippers, or got along with their neighbors. I don’t know if they hated white men, or had rampant sex and wild parties.</p>

<p>Oh wait, I do know how the media has portrayed the entire team: as a flock of angels. </p>

<p>The other team (whose school name we can’t use in this thread - for fear of offending some) are clearly the Devils. At least that is what the media and civil rights activists have told us.</p>

<p>I personally do not know anyone on either team.</p>

<p>“The other team (whose school name we can’t use in this thread - for fear of offending some) are clearly the Devils”</p>

<p>More specifically, The Blue Devils ;)</p>

<p>Why is it that some posters would rather eat nails than address what Don Imus did to the Rutgers team without making sarcastic, dismissive comments? ‘Sticks and stones’ and ‘get over it’ is all that can be said for these girls? </p>

<p>My, my… I do believe the compassion well ran dry somewhere along on the road between Durham and Santa Clara. </p>

<p>And until the obsession of some subsides, I guess we can only look forward to more threads turning that inimitable shade of blue.</p>

<p>What more can people do, ldmom? Imus has been fired. You want blood, maybe?</p>

<p>Actually, “get over it” is probably the best advice anybody could give these girls.</p>

<p>Not “let’s get you on Oprah and Dr. Phil to explore your pain.”</p>

<p>Now if this incident leads to greater awareness and criticism of gangsta rap, I’m all for it.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>Blame the messenger is really replacing personal responsibility in our culture. It’s alright for someone to harm you in secret; the real culprit is the person who exposes or tries to get justice for the situation. </p>

<p>By this logic, it’s harmless to cheat on your spouse. After all, you won’t be the one hurting him or her, it’ll be whoever rats you out who does the damage. I don’t think there is one person here who would rationalize infidelity that way. Why rationalize racism that way?</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>Amen, brother</p>

<p>edit: reply to 255 … system wasn’t satisified with just amen…had to add something.</p>

<p>From everything I have seen, the students are ready to move on. They have accepted the apology. The “activists” are the ones that won’t let this go.
The girls understand that it was a stupid thing that was said by a single washed out talk show host who was trying to make a joke. They understand that this same guy has been saying offensive things to many people for many years. They understand that his stupid insensitive comment doesn’t necessarily speak for the entire universe. </p>

<p>Again, some of us actually believe that there was no significant harm to these girls from this incident. I do not understand why some posters can not accept that. Whether you believe that or not is your opinion. Everyone is entitled to an opinion.</p>

<p>conyat: Okay, now we’re “rationalizing racism.” Why am I not surprised at your contribution.</p>

<p>Didn’t you just describe Imus’ remarks as harmless? Stating that the real harm was done by those who criticized the remarks? If that’s not rationalizing, I don’t know what is. </p>

<p>If a friend’s spouse tried to give her that line (I didn’t hurt you honey, it was the person who told you about the affair), you would see it for what it was.</p>