<p>I posit that Kant was wrong and that all categories are unfounded. Where he believed the categories are the logical conclusion that Hume missed, I believe that he is imposing universality on beings for which there is no real philosophical impetus. Therefore, the categories are basically Kant’s use of reason to justify reason.</p>
<p>Kant said it was necessary to destroy reason to justify faith. I feel he destroyed reason to create reason. And what’s the point of create a new reason with artifical limitations for the sake of their own exploration? What have you really learned?</p>
<p>What do you guys think?</p>