<p>I thought the answer was she could start over easier, thus “easier to remedy mistakes”…</p>
<p>@dunghy
that is true, but not the main gist. she talks of how she could put more detail into the things she draw as opposed to the stoic embroidery.</p>
<p>Thank you!
So what’s the answer for the question that asks difference (or preference) between embroidery and painting?</p>
<p>What were the options for the question asking difference? Does anyone remember?</p>
<p>So how many questions were there for the Chinese painter passage?
I thought there was only question that has a choice regarding “making mistakes or remedy.”
But my classmates who took the same exam told me that there were two consecutive questions that contain that choice.
One question was about what line reference portrays and the other question was what’s the difference (or preference) between embroidery and paintings.</p>
<p>It is definitely “easy to remedy mistakes” because she could tear out the page and start over</p>
<p>and “talented but lacking in confidence” is correct</p>
<p>No Maxyend. she mentions “unfettered by thread” and " liberating" gives you more than an implication of the limitations of embroidery in presenting her subject. can you be reasonable for once here? you got this one wrong</p>
<p>Hahahaha, I give up. Miasanmia is now starting to believe it’s all a conspiracy against him.</p>
<p>I think both answer choices make some sense, but I chose ‘tear out pages’ because IMO, it makes a lot more sense. And from the looks of it everybody else thought the same.</p>
<p>Hey guys, I’ve been looking through the November 2010 and this forum and I have a few questions I hope you guys can answer:</p>
<p>1) Echolocation - textures or color? I realize that everyone says colors and I can see why it can be colors, but I think you can argue it both ways. I’ve already accepted that textures is wrong, but I’d still like to know the reasoning. The excerpt is:</p>
<p>Bats may even use the sensations that we call colour for their own purposes, to represent differences in the world out there that have nothing to do with the physics of wavelength, but which play a functional role for the bat, similar to the role that colours play to us. Perhaps male bats have body surfaces that are Subtly textured so that the echoes that bounce off them are perceived by females as gorgeously coloured, the sound equivalent of the nuptial Plumage of a bird of paradise.</p>
<p>2) Spanning long eras or varying skill? I think this is still a controversy. I put long eras.</p>
<p>3) For the college athletes - appealing but ludicrous, logical but controversial etc?</p>
<p>4) Exhibit or spectacle?</p>
<p>5) Studied and spontaneous or _____ and leisurely? Everyone says the former, but again I’m not 100% convinced.</p>
<p>6) College athletes - shift to a new point or reiterate a previous point?</p>
<p>Thank you so much, you guys. You’d be helping me out a lot by relieving my stress. I realize I’m not the best critical reader in town, but I do hope to get around a 700. I usually scored around 700-750 in practice tests but I got really anxious.</p>
<p>By the way Maxyend, I completely agree with you and all your answers! miasanmia clearly doesn’t even know what he’s talking about. Keep up the good work! :)</p>
<p>I But there, she’s discovering, is something liberating about ink or lead. Unfettered by thread, she can bring the whims of her thoughts—whispering trees, wilting flowers—to life quickly, if often ineptly. And even when the images are inept the solution is refreshingly simple. She simply rips the page out and starts over.</p>
<p>Just read the sentence without the “- -” part.
What’s refreshing about it, is that she can do it quickly, not that she can do it. You obviously misread the sentence, and it’s understandable. Please accept that you are wrong again.</p>
<p>@abhopbipbip5</p>
<ol>
<li><p>I think the question was why the author mentioned the bird, so it would be color of the feather. But I’ve said before that I can’t remember the exact question.</p></li>
<li><p>Still not sure about this, I still feel it’s the multiple eras, but I wasn’t sure about this during the test, and I’m still not convinced now.</p></li>
<li><p>appealing but ludicrous. Passage 1 at the end of the first paragraph said something that meant exactly that but using synonyms of those words.</p></li>
<li><p>spectacle. definitely</p></li>
<li><p>I went for studied/spontaneously. I can’t remember the other ones though.</p></li>
<li><p>definitely shift the terms of discussion (from whether college athletes should be paid to what should be done with the profits made by the school/reinvesting that in academics)</p></li>
</ol>
<p>Thanks. I hope it turns out I’m right on results day.</p>
<p>
this sentence conveys the ease of bringing objects to life by drawing. She just means that embroidery didn’t allow her to bring objects to life so easily (she felt fettered by thread). And then this point was supported by the fact that she can just tear the page out and start over. The whole paragraph tells how easy it is in drawing to remedy your mistakes.</p>
<p>abhopbipbip5, </p>
<p>1) the bird of paradise was mentioned because the author was giving an example of a bird who was attracting females with the colors of its feathers</p>
<p>2) I put long eras. I went back to the passage to assure myself “varying styles” is wrong and did convince myself that he was a master of one style.</p>
<p>3) I chose appealing but ludicrous because he wouldn’t agree it’s logical.</p>
<p>4) I chose spectacle.</p>
<p>5) Studied and spontaneous because she starts out by drawing the lines carefully and then she changes her technique to drawing spontaneouly</p>
<p>6) I chose shift but not sure about this one.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>The exact part of the passage that proves the “humans can see effortlessly” answer.</p>
<p><a href=“Meetup | Find Local Groups, Events, and Activities Near You”>Meetup | Find Local Groups, Events, and Activities Near You;
<p>Wow, CB takes separate paragraphs out of several places and makes one passage of them. I always thought they take the who passage from one place.</p>
<p>Hey guys, thanks for replying to me earlier. I just wanted to ask about that one question where something along the lines of ‘expanding on a larger view’ and ‘reiterating a point’ were some of the answer options. Sorry for not being clearer before, but I remember now that this was indeed for the bat passage. Is ‘expanding on a larger viewpoint’ as the answer unanimous? I believe this referred to the part of the passage where a scientist ranted on about bats having unique electronic-like abilities or something.</p>
<p>i agree with most your answers Maxyend, but “humans can see effortlessly” is wrong. im quite sure about that.</p>
<p>“we can see and we can’t echolocate.”
this means that we have the sensory organs to “see” (eyes), but we don’t have the sensory organs to be able to “echolate” (whatever bats have)</p>
<p>its not really a matter of effort, its more to do with whether or not we
are ABLE to do so through the sense organs that allow us these actions</p>
<p>which is why the answer should be “we relate more with sighted animals”, since
we too have the same sensory organs of sight</p>
<p>can anyone manage all the correct cr answers into one single post? That’ll be pretty easy to look for. thx!!!</p>
<p>MODERATOR’S NOTE: If there is any more bickering on this thread, I will close it. If you don’t agree on the right answer, just drop it. Stop trying to convince other posters you’re right.</p>