@LutherVan, please try reading carefully. I didn’t write post #27. That was @MYOS1634.
And no, UCL isn’t really “far better known” in the States than Warwick. Both are virtually unknown.
Before joining CC a couple years ago, I didn’t differentiate UCL from SOAS or the other UoL colleges. There was Oxbridge & LSE, I had heard Imperial referred to as the British MIT, I knew that St. Andrews, Edinburgh, and the other Ancient Scottish unis were very old, and then there was everyone else.
And I had attended an Ivy-equivalent for undergrad, got an MBA from a M7 b-school, and worked on Wall Street, the buyside, as well as Silicon Valley.
If you look on LinkedIn, this is understandable. If you look at who works at McKinsey, among UK uni grads, it’s Oxford followed Cambridge followed by LSE with everyone else far below.
This isn’t the case with American unis, where Northwestern places better than both Yale and Princeton, UChicago, Duke, and Cornell are at the same level as Princeton (both UMich and UVa, which are much bigger, also are around there), and Columbia and Penn (which has Wharton) are on the same level as Stanford and MIT.
The point is, US higher education has a very strong and deep upper and upper-middle class of unis and colleges (understandable given that the US has 5 times the UK’s population) while most UK unis outside of Oxbridge & LSE (and St. Andrews these days; maybe Imperial and Edinburgh as well) would draw blank stares in the States.
In any case, it’s doesn’t matter. UCL places in to the City just fine and recruiters in MBB consulting will know of it.