i've noticed that no one has the attention span for my long e-mails/posts, and I don

<p>i’ve noticed that no one has the attention span for my long e-mails/posts (well, the ones in the past anyways), and I don’t have the attention span for most people’s activities.</p>

<p>alternatively you could call it “boredom” but I prefer to use the word “attention span” to avoid the appearance of intentionality/free will (which has the habit of making past memories more painful)</p>

<p>and I guess to illustrate that it’s not the fault of either of us and that both of us should take all necessary measures not to judge (which, to me, is far more of a “crime” than almost anything else)</p>

<p>for your longer posts, that is correct</p>

<p>i agree. I never read through them completely…i just skim through them :slight_smile: the more concise & to the point it is the better.</p>

<p>Although some might argue otherwise, it is my opinion that, all things considered, in my experience, it is in many, if not most, and indeed some might argue all cases, not a completely bad idea to be, as far as possible, concise and to the point.</p>

<p>^ when you are bored some time, you should read “Random thoughts” by IK</p>

<p>it’s like the War and Peace of CC</p>

<p>■■■■■ “war and peace” of CC :p</p>

<p><a href=“http://talk.collegeconfidential.com/college-confidential-cafe/432292-random-unorganized-thoughts.html[/url]”>http://talk.collegeconfidential.com/college-confidential-cafe/432292-random-unorganized-thoughts.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

<p>yes :b</p>