Sorry, but those who knew what was going on should be prosecuted too. It’s the coverups that are as bad as the actual actions. Shame on anyone who knew about any of these things, and never spoke up to protect others.
yes, shame. But unless there is evidence of an actual criminal conspiracy, these cases are very hard to prosecute. The “coulda shoulda woulda” in the absence of evidence is a tough hill to climb for a prosecutor.
Why oh why can’t men like this think about if they would want their mother, daughters, sisters treated this way…
This:
None of the investigative records provided by New Mexico appear to be among the more than 3 million pages of documents released last month by the U.S. Department of Justice.
Where there’s smoke, there’s very likely fire. Our government must release everything.
https://www.nytimes.com/2026/02/28/us/jeffrey-epstein-doctors.html
Sorry no gift link but the title says enough imo.
I could see it all.
This stood out as wow - perhaps because I put the educational system (even their affiliated medical clinics) at the top of society’s good. Perhaps I shouldn’t.
“A dentist at Columbia University asked Mr. Epstein how much work he wanted done on a “girl” with severe tooth decay.”
Then there’s more - well the entire thing is wow - but a few tidbits if people can’t read - normally I can’t, but I can see this one:
“Mr. Epstein rewarded his preferred doctors with hefty payments, Apple Watches, introductions to celebrities and vacations on his private island and his New Mexico ranch. One cash-strapped dermatologist asked the sexual predator to co-sign his car lease.”
And yes, it gets worse.
Damn - what money or access to fame will do for people.
I don’t know what these people were thinking.
I’m thinking they are like colleges - going for the $$.
I would hope people have a red line - apparently their red line is farther than mine would be, by far.
I don’t think there was much thought at all going on.
It’s like the doctors who protect the docs they know to be incompetent, substance abusers, etc. In my state, the last doctor who had his license revoked had a list of complaints as long as your arm. I kinda sorta understand how the hospital management ignored or decided “not enough evidence” here– that’s how large institutions work. But his colleagues? The other doctors showing up at Tumor Board meetings, morbidity reviews, sending him referrals???
Well it was like pay to play. You donate to my foundation or project and I help you with girls that aren’t related to you with their STDs - curing and reporting.
I am somewhat reminded of something that happened during my time in grad school at Penn, which coincided with the aftermath of the activities of such illustrious Wharton School alumni as Ira Sokolow, David S. Brown, Robert Salsbury, and Michael Milken. In response, the Wharton School added a required undergrad course on ethics—and a couple people I knew who were Wharton School students told me, after taking the course, that it was less a true ethics course and more a “how to not get caught” course.*
It’s been widely commented that some of the training for the professions includes that same sort of undercurrent—a sort of a “Here’s the legal line, and here’s how to keep from technically crossing it.” What we need is not just training in the legalities, but an acknowledgment that behaving ethically doesn’t mean staying on the right side of the law, it means staying on the right side of humanity—but then the professions may well become less lucrative, and in a capitalist system we can’t have that, can we?
*I am told that it has since been improved into a true business ethics course. (Technically two courses, of which students must take one.) Still not sure what a single ethics course can do, but at least it’s there.
“It basically was not a big relationship.” Really? Do you always give private medical information about women to a man, particularly one you don’t have a “big relationship” with?
They should all lose their US medical licenses…then be charged with a criminal activity.
With enough lawyers and money, legal issues can be delayed for a very long time in the court system.
No matter how hard they try, this is still lingering. Can’t wait to see who she calls a loser, past their prime hack, lawyer this time.
Maybe she’ll squirm like Noem did to Klobuchar yesterday. Bondi is a lot sharper than Noem though.
House committee votes to subpoena Bondi to answer questions over Epstein files | PBS News
They keep removing files…like they hope no one notices.
And they seem to assume that a bunch of people didn’t download everything as soon as it was released. I mean, do they think that everybody is THAT stupid?
Actually, nobody needs to answer that last question.
It’s working, we seem to be quietly no longer talking about Jeffrey Epstein and the disgusting files we need released.
6 days of no posts?
This is exactly what they are hoping for. That we will move on to something else.
Like bombing another country?
I just got tired of posting so my “why???” posts. lol
I don’t think the Senate is going to let it drop.