<p>wasnt it 24 degrees?</p>
<p>^I put 24 because if you looked at the graph, the temperature today is 2.5C less than 140000 years ago. I might have been wrong though</p>
<p>I think the answer was “undesirable” because wasn’t there a somewhat negative tone when describing assumptions?</p>
<p>on one of the english passages, there was one about which is least acceptable… the choices were improving, fostering, upgrading, and something else (it fit, so that choice doesn’t matter)… is the least acceptable one fostering of upgrading?</p>
<p>i thought it was upgrading</p>
<p>I was in between improving and upgrading.</p>
<p>In the end, I put upgrading and so did most of the people on this site</p>
<p>Well it would have been 24 is it was 135,000, but on the graph it went way down right before it went back to 140,000…didn’t it?</p>
<p>And yeah, it’s upgrading.</p>
<p>Another question, how do colleges see your scores? Do they see them in sections or as a whole? What about the English+Writing? Do they see that or do they see exactly what you got on your essay too?</p>
<p>I thought it was 18 degrees. Exactly at the 140,000 year line, the temperature graph was at -5 degrees.</p>
<p>upgrading fo sho</p>
<p>for some reason i put fostering because it was the only one that didn’t imply an increase as upgrade, improve, and stimulating all do</p>
<p>any thoughts?</p>
<p>Which cell picture was the first phase of mitosis? Which one was “aligning along metaphase plate”?</p>
<p>first stage- prophase- i put the one with the bunch of cells clumped together
the metaphase one- i put the one that had 2 rows of cells alligned.</p>
<p>does anyone know if theres a curve? cause the science killled me</p>
<p>i know that i put like cell #4 for the first one and cell #2 for the second one. look up the right answers for the phases on this linkhttp://<a href=“http://www.accessexcellence.org/RC/VL/GG/mitosis2.php”>www.accessexcellence.org/RC/VL/GG/mitosis2.php</a></p>
<p>Humez, who teaches women’s studies at the University of Massachusetts, Boston, cites the ‘‘advantage of a much larger number of primary sources’’ than earlier students of Tubman. Indeed, she and Kate Clifford Larson, in her first book, ‘‘Bound for the Promised Land,’’ have both done extensive and imaginative research in local historical sources that tell us almost more than we want to know about the Eastern Shore in the mid-19th century; in the papers of antislavery activists who interacted with Tubman; in the correspondence of an earlier Tubman biographer who in the 1940’s interviewed individuals who had been alive long enough to remember her. </p>
<p>^^above is the original text…it definitely seems as if they coauthored it rather than it being Larson’s first book…but im still really confused on that one</p>
<p>nooooo i was deciding between the two but just put coauthored</p>
<p>Ugh someone beat me to posting it.</p>
<p>Yes on Amazon it does say that larson authored the book solo & by the timeline with her other books it appears to have been her first.</p>
<p>If you had the viscosity flipped around how many questions does that mean you likely missed?</p>
<p>Anyone have more detailed knowlege of the questions in the last part of the science section?</p>
<p>Ugh before the science section it was going so well.</p>
<p>don’t worry phishfan0969, i did the same exact thing</p>
<p>do you know if there is a curve?</p>
<p>it really depends…but unfortunately, i don’t think that it would be curved much even if it were. science is the dumbest section because it is wayyyy harder than it should be. reading a bunch of graphs is supposed to be super easy but i always run out of time and get confused</p>
<p>on english, there was A LOT of “LEAST ACCEPTABLE” questions…weeeeaaarddd</p>