<p>Beautiful nerd, u can usually miss up to 2 or skip 3 questions and get an 800 on CR.</p>
<p>And thats for typically easy CR.</p>
<p>which section was that SC with touched in? and nobody remembers the choices?</p>
<p>Empathy???
negligent, essential???
summation/complement???</p>
<p>what were the questions to these answers? </p>
<p>compiled list even further:</p>
<p>alstair interconnected genes
dramatic then anticlimax
enigmatic
biased
distressed/opposed
expectation and reality
direct quotes
more historical
expression/intensity of need
perturbed
attitude toward students
impassioned
eating nutrients
dailiness everyday life
solid “state” = form
edison practical intelligence
prestigious endorsement
whale painting astonishingly friendly and fluid
democratic
poke fun
protean (not virulent)
Empathy
negligent, essential
engagement = involvement
naivete
destroying/instill
conviviality
infinitesimal
stagnant = unchanging
Agatha mystery novel=emphasize a point
Ingenious
Unchanging
credulous
urgent
summation/complement
difference between passage 1 and 2: talking about students
reading books: all the answers had to do with finding emotional needs and such
accuracy of memory
rocket ship=obsolecence
contradiction: rejecting research of company
integrity of universities: limit company freedom to publish or not to publish research
first two lines about caravan: dramatic statement to anticlimactic humor
passage two was more historical
overstated similarities for blogg comparison
alistair greatly affected by experiences
tactile=touch</p>
<p>Still in debate:
- scientifically inclined or philosophical
- tropical ocean or volcano
- even the most solid objects aren’t impervious to water/no essential differences between natural and manufactured objects</p>
<p>Thanks so much esplin = ]
made my day</p>
<p>Hey this question hasnt been answered yet:</p>
<p>Do you guys remember a SC about an extensive Native American work and the answer choices were like </p>
<p>A)outline
B)survey
C)synopsis
…</p>
<p>Did you have that too or was than an experimental?</p>
<p>
Oh…rings a vague bell. Can’t remember what I put, but if it was between endearing and impassioned I would have put impassioned.</p>
<p>Experimental b/c I didn’t have that.</p>
<p>I think it was impassioned. What was the experimental section?</p>
<p>BeautifulNerd, was your reply in response to my question??</p>
<p>hey guys, what about the question where it asks why the author referenced books of high “literary status” or something like that? do we have a common consensus? i thought answer was experts have narrow limits as to how they define it…other people seemed to agree?</p>
<p>can somebody please answer me =( what section was the tacitful=touch question and what were the other choices…?</p>
<p>Oh yeah, that was to you mike</p>
<p>@bryan
it was touched, interpreted…um that’s all i remember I think envision was one</p>
<p>do you remember which section it was in?</p>
<p>what were the other choices to why the author referenced books of high “literary status” ??</p>
<p>becuase i’m not sure if i put experts have narrow limits or not.</p>
<p>ummm…</p>
<ol>
<li>all people interpret novels according to their own experiences</li>
<li>such a standard fails to realize that reading for education is secondary to reading for pleasure</li>
<li>what i said about the literary experts (this was actually choice A)</li>
<li>don’t remember the last</li>
</ol>
<p>I don’t get why the rocket thing was not domineering.</p>
<p>That part of the passage described the rocket as “imposing”</p>
<p>@bryan
No, I don’t remember, sorry.</p>
<p>Bee-</p>
<p>Lol nvm misread your post</p>
<p>rtgrove: i think it was choice 3, about the literary experts narrowly defining what is good to read. Something like that. I agree, choice 1 is way too strong (ALL people), and choice 2 doesn’t seem right b/c the passage didn’t mention education</p>