<p>Typically when I see a high school seniors dealing with controlling parents, I tell them to keep their mouth shut, do not argue, and you will be off to college in a couple months, and controlling your own life. A recent situation I have observed is more troubling. </p>
<p>The parents are religiously very conservative and recently discovered that their HS graduate 18 year old daughter has talked to some boys (not a euphemism), and has made some girl friends at school who are not part of their religious group. The parents are now keeping her at home 24/7, she can only go out with in-group friends, they are slut shaming her for having talked to boys, using standard brain-washing control techniques generally, and saying they will allow her to go to college in the fall, but after she completes her first semester, they expect her to move back home and go to a local religious college, so they can maintain total control 24/7.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, the parents have a lot of money. so I do not see what this young woman can do other than be quiet, agree, and continue to go to school. </p>
<p>What is your best advice to person in this woman’s situation?</p>
<p>I understand that she can technically walk away but with no money and no college education, that would be a disastrous outcome.</p>
<p>I am glad we live in a free country, but I am also asking myself a few questions about this situation. Why does a young woman in this situation seem to have almost no rights at all? Is it reasonable that to get an education, this person has to be subjected to being treated like a piece of property for years? Why is it that it usually girls/women who are subjected to this type of situation? If parents are forcing an adult daughter to behave a certain way in order to get money for education, how is that different than an employee/employer relationship? If the parents actions have essentially made their daughter an employee, then shouldn’t the daughter be extended the rights that employees have? Certainly it is reasonable for parents who are paying for college to expect certain behaviors from their children; however, perhaps there should be limits?</p>
<p>I don’t have all of the answers, but it seems that in most other situations a rich person does not usually have the right to demand to control and monitor the actions of a poor person 24/7 in exchange for a financial benefit. A rationale of, “they can leave if they want to” is not considered adequate. Why do we as a society allow it in a situation like this one?</p>
<p>At the other extreme, we can say that the government should simply not involve itself with family situations at all. It is not the government’s role. But if a woman in this situation then just takes the money she needs for school from her parents, or kills her father for threatening her at home, then according to this philosophy, that would be fine too. That can’t be good either.</p>
<p>In the end, I don’t really know what I think about all of this except that I find it very troubling. What are your thoughts?</p>