<p>The flight attendant was a child actress, and is blabbing that she had sex with Arnold for the first time when she was 16 on the set of Little House on the Prairie. She also claims she had a LONG TIME relationship with Arnold during their marriage.</p>
<p>But back to the original question: WhyOhWhy can’t they all just keep it in their pants??</p>
<p>“But back to the original question: WhyOhWhy can’t they all just keep it in their pants??”</p>
<p>Answer: Because he’s “The Sperminator” and, similar to the characters on Little House On The Prarie", he likes to ride bareback?</p>
<p>Why is it so important? Why anybody cares? Media just making money on it…because we support media making money on it…if we did not, they would not, and then nobody would know about it and everything else will remain the same, it really does not change anything. Maria knew who she is marrying, was it a secret? She took everything into account and decided that it was worth it. It is her life, it is his life, it is not my life, who feels that their life has changed because of what happened to M and A?</p>
<p>YDS: is that a real name???..</p>
<p>sounds like a name of a Broadway character playing a flight attendant…</p>
<p>Can’t wait to see the Time cover…</p>
<p>Urges vs self-control. Nature vs nurture.</p>
<p>A media feeding frenzy to be sure! Makes you wonder if more women will come out of the woodwork? Like with Tiger Woods when his indiscretions were made public. </p>
<p>How does Eliot Spitzer on CNN report on all these sex scandals without thinking about his past? It is a little like the kettle calling the pot black, as the old expression goes.</p>
<p>“I read before that complaints from husbands or boyfriends that they were deceived fall on deaf ears in the court room (in some states) after a certain time limit, no matter the veracity of the complaint.”</p>
<p>That’s correct. The legal theory is designed to protect the child. The courts don’t want men to be able to abandon kids they’ve raised, no matter the circumstances of the conception.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>[How</a> Did Arnold Schwarzenegger Keep His Secret Kid So Totally Secret? | Comcast.net](<a href=“Discovery Hub - News & Technology”>Discovery Hub - News & Technology)</p>
<p>:eek:</p>
<p>
Did AS condone this?</p>
<p>A.S. – like many rich and powerful people – seem to think the little rules that govern ordinary human interaction no longer apply. They don’t have to be nice, be polite, be faithful, be decent because ::Duh:: they are the rich and the powerful. “Do you know who I am?” is like the buzz of a rattlesnake’s warning.</p>
<p>Like the French “womanizer” Strauss-Kahn.</p>
<p>I wouldn’t call him a ‘womanizer’, I’d call him an (alleged) rapist. Big difference.</p>
<p>And, for a cool $23M, their house can be yours. [Maria</a> Shriver and Arnold Schwarzenegger’s Former Compound Listed at $23 Million | Zillow Blog - Real Estate Market Stats, Celebrity Real Estate, and Zillow News](<a href=“http://www.zillow.com/blog/2011-05-18/maria-shriver-and-arnold-schwarzeneggers-former-compound-listed-at-23-million/]Maria”>http://www.zillow.com/blog/2011-05-18/maria-shriver-and-arnold-schwarzeneggers-former-compound-listed-at-23-million/)</p>
<p>TatinG, I agree with you. NBC played quite a few clips this morning in which he was described as a womanizer. It really struck a raw chord with me. </p>
<p>Part of the problem with powerful men is that everyone kisses their behinds. In addition, I have observed that many powerful men seem to believe that their take on things is reality. If they think something is fine, they by God it’s fine. They truly seem to believe that.</p>
<p>If this attack had happened in a cheap motel instead of a luxury suite, the attacker would have been called a rapist, not a ‘womanizer’. And while I think AS is a sleazebag, it is also unfair to lump him in with DSK as one and the same.</p>
<p>Well, at least he has made a wise move by putting his acting career on hold for now. If there is a possibility of repairing some damage, I’m glad to see he is making it a priority.</p>
<p>Looks like it’s their ex-house, a residence they sold in 2003. Looks very nice…</p>
<p>I don’t think this will effect his career. Most people don’t care what actors do in their private lives.</p>
<p>Could very well affect the $$$ that he might have received on the motivational lecture tour. But then he’s got plenty of money. I think he wants to stay “relevant”…not retire himself out to pasture.</p>