<p>Never mind, I see why that question is easy now and I was thinking WAY too much about it. That’s annoying.</p>
<p>any predictions for the curve?
-1 grid-in?</p>
<p>excellent! thanks masterfox and monoclide :)</p>
<p>I’m not sure if it was experimental, but I’m pretty sure that I had math experimental and I hope it was because I did not answer that question.</p>
<p>Sorry for the double post…but diagol that was experimental section with the cylinder. I know which one you are talking about with the 2p<x<3p.
I said x could be 49, if each p section was = 17.
That one confused me tho… anybody remember it?</p>
<p>No, I’m talking about the question that asked how many numbers more than 9 but less than 100 have a tens digit less than a ones digit. </p>
<p>the ice cream one was 3.50 dollars</p>
<p>Lowest prime divisor question I put 5, and I’m pretty sure that’s the right answer.</p>
<p>i got 36 for the “tens digit is less than one digit” question. i got 65 for the diagonals of the polygon, and $3.50 for the ice cream and soda question</p>
<p>Uh that ice cream one was like 3.25 or 3.50. Just a system of equations.</p>
<p>haha, my bad, i meant to say i put 36 and the thirties, not 66. thanks!</p>
<p>what was the one (math fill in) with 2p<x<3p, then there were 3 p% and then x%? i got x = 5/11 because p = 2/11 made sense. but 5/11 in percentage form = 45.45454…% so i had to round it to 45.5. not sure if that’s right though…</p>
<p>jules92-- it was 5. it threw me off but when i multiplied each number together it keeps the prime factor of each one–so 5 would be the lowest.</p>
<p>jules92- I put 5 as well for that prime divoser or whatever it was pretty sure it was right too.</p>
<p>how could that be? a circle has 360 degrees…</p>
<p>The math seemed really easy to me, but this was mu first time testing</p>
<p>could someone explain the f(ab) question and how to go about it… it was f(ab)=f(a)+f(b)</p>
<p>I remember how this cuz i stared at this problem with my remaining 5 minutes after completing the rest of the section and i could not get any sense of logic of how to go about this problem…</p>
<p>And how do you go about that p and x pie chart… not sure if i did it correctly</p>
<p>Well the sequence one with m could not have been experimental then right? Because I didn’t have any cylinder questions… are there multiple experimentals of each section?</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>Oh, that was 36. </p>
<p>10s (8): 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19
20s (7): 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29
30s (6): 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39
40s (5): 45, 46, 47, 48, 49
50s (4): 56, 57, 58, 59
60s (3): 67, 68, 69
70s (2): 78, 79
80s (1): 89
90s (0):</p>
<p>nyorker, it wasn’t asking for degrees, it was asking for a percentage, as in a pie chart</p>
<p>i put 5 as well, that was simple plugging in to the good ol’ calc</p>
<p>it wanted lowest so, 3?</p>