<p>They should make a Math Level III. The level II is too easy… anyone can get an 800.</p>
<p>It’s called AMC buddy.</p>
<p>^ Yeah, that.</p>
<p>I made USAMO, but I’m talking about something administered by thecollegeboard</p>
<p>^Lol…</p>
<p>trollthread</p>
<p>Math III- Calculus</p>
<p>(That would probably be easier.)</p>
<p>I think AMC is a bit too difficult for Math III. Calculus is probably the ideal Math III; AMC would be Math IV.</p>
<p>If Math III were Calculus, I would do better on it than Math II lol.</p>
<p>I agree with that. Math III/IV would most likely appeal to a far more self-selecting group (particularly the type that posts on CC on a regular basis ;)).</p>
<p>Instead of going forward, we should go backwards. Math 1/2 anyone?</p>
<p>I think CB should make an SAT Subject Test in Advanced Social Skills.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>That’s called an interview</p>
<p>SAT II Math V- Haiti and its history in the field of mathematics</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>I think I would do the same. I definitely agree with Greed: 11% of test takers getting 800s is way too much. They need to either a) make the test harder or b) have a harsher curve, I would prefer A.</p>
<p>Also, if math III were calculus, I’m pretty sure 11% of the people would still get 800s haha.</p>
<p>I would prefer no calculators allowed to lessen the number of 800’s.</p>
<p>But I like using my TI-89…</p>
<p>^me too. I just couldn’t answer some questions if I didn’t have my calculator, such as standard deviation and matrixes. Plus, harder trig questions are almost impossible to do without calculators.</p>
<p>I also love my TI-89. But really, having a graphing calculator makes some of the questions so damn easy.</p>
<p>^LOL I ain’t complaining… along with the thousands of other people who aren’t, either. If you’re looking for a challenge, why don’t you participate in USAMO or some such competition? Or, you can ask your university friends for math lecture sheets and do those for fun.</p>