I am a doctoral candidate in a Ph.D program right now.
I reviewed my old resumes recently to see if there was anything relevant I could include from undergrad (as I am about to graduate with my Ph.D sometime in March or May 2024). Long story short, I think I may have embellished and I am not sure whether I did that intentionally or not (I wanted to get into an MA program really bad at the time so maybe). It is getting to the point I am doubting whether I did that on purpose or not.
I initially thought I had listed just my duties and that the time in which I did them was only 3 months rather than 9 months (I thought I had to list how long I was a member, which was 9 months). However, it turns out I had the following:
- Ran participants using an eye tracker and learned related software
- Provided feedback for the control and experimental variables used and manipulated
- Chose images used in experiment
- Ran data and made charts using SPSS that will be in the study once published
For point 1, the āparticipantsā I ran were just other graduate students for testing the experiment before it was set to be run at the start of next academic year. As implied in my previous post, this never happened since the PI was a well intended, yet very disorganized and forgetful (to the point I could not even get an LOR from her because she was so unreliable).
For point 2, I did this during the summer in the lab. I gave feedback on the stimuli they used.
For point 3, this was one I did.
For point 4, I did help run data at one point and made charts in SPSS. Those were going to be the model for a study that the lab was going to try to publish (but never did).
The running theme here is that all of these points were momentary and they were things I made bullet points out of anyway and seemingly stretched over the course of an academic year. Knowing what I know now, there was zero way I would have wrote it like this. I now see on my resume in the past few years that I cut point 1 and edited the other points so it was more accurate to the time.
I distinctly remember that I had some doubt at the time when wrote it years ago as to whether I was accurate and just went with what ālooked better.ā Again, I did most of these things but I am not sure if I embellished or not. Even so, it was probably an accident.
I was also only in the lab a few hours a week (as in as low as 1-3 sometimes) so I am so doubtful to the point where I am having a lot of stress all over again. I do not even know if I deserved to get my foot in the door somewhere at the MA, let alone the Ph.D level.
Iāve also realized I cited a poster from my undergrad incorrectly. I accidentally said I presented a poster at an undergraduate research symposium when it was actually a bi-annual psychology poster conference. I also put myself as the first author even though I didnāt remember the order that was agreed upon (although I distinctly remember my poster partner didnāt mind the order so I probably just went āwhy not?ā even though that order mattered and I didnāt know it at the time I made the entry). In case itās also important, I presented this poster for an extra credit assignment in a Cognitive Neuroscience class. The TA for the class guided us through the whole thing and I honestly didnāt feel like I deserved to be an author even though I agreed to help and did a poor job at doing so (given how I walked away with a C in the class overall. I wasnāt a good undergrad student). When I reviewed the old email exchanges, I definitely donāt feel like I deserve it whatsoever and may take it off my CV even though the conference organizers encouraged all of us to list the posters on our CV.
Problem is⦠I got admitted to 6/8 Masterās programs and Iām worried that poster may have given them an impression I did more than I actually did and that couldāve got me in the door when I otherwise shouldnāt have done so.
I also had a different instance one time during my Masterās program where I listed myself as an āInvestigatorā (this was how the campus where I was a research assistant called it) and was corrected by the MA program director to list it as Research Assistant (even though I was called an investigator by my lab, albeit the duties were the same as a research assistant). The reason for the correction was because the program director said it looked like I did more than I actually did even though I wasnāt a Principal Investigator (some context - the PI for this lab was German so he may have just called his research assistants the equivalent term, investigators, and I didnāt know it since that was my first lab).
Anyway, Iām concerned about someone noticing this and potentially obstructing me currently.
Do I need to be concerned about whether these changes will be noticed at all by other parties? If so, what are the consequences?