<p>I could not disagree with this more!!! </p>
<p>Those applying to 4 or fewer schools are likely applying to local schools with low to moderate selectivity. Plus you have to factor in the ED/EA applicants into this number.</p>
<p>Carolyn assumes with a well targeted list of a few schools one will likely find the right fit, be happy, and save themselves the “stress” of applying to many schools. I can assure you the stress is well worth it. </p>
<p>1) Remember at the top level the schools are choosing you, not the other way around. With admissions rates of 10-20% for the top schools, you need to apply to multiple schools even with perfect stats! Long gone are the days when a certain SAT score and GPA meant admission at certain schools.
2) Top schools have much more in common with each other than with other schools - most importantly the caliber of the students. I loved Dartmouth, but would much rather attend Columbia (the opposite in many ways) over a place like Ohio University simply because a great part of the college experience is the quality of students you are around. Not to mention the grad placement, job opportunities, etc.
3) The ability to negotiate financial aid offers. With tuition costing as much as it does, for those needing aid the savings in cost coming from the ability to compare offers is often ten times the short term savings in application fees.
4) Its hard to know a school until “days on campus” after you are admitted, tours are rarely enough. Having choices at this stage is critical. You can read all the guidebooks you want, but until you spend a night on campus you won’t know what you really want. For those applying ED, most have spent some time (a weekend or day) at these schools.
5) With the Internet and common application it is much easier to apply to multiple schools with not much additional effort.
6) The admissions difficulty of schools is perhaps a step funtion with different buckets, but there are many more buckets than four to six. If you only apply to four schools and get unlucky with your third school you are in trouble. I don’t think most top kids would be happy at any “safety.”
7) If protecting your child from stress is the critical point here, ever consider how stressful it might be for them to end up at a place where they feel they could have done better than? </p>
<p>Here’s an anecdotal story.</p>
<p>My roommate (valedictorian of his high school) applied to Princeton, Amherst, Colby, Middlebury, and Skidmore, fully expecting to get into Amherst. Well, he didn’t get into Amherst or Princeton, and then the Middlebury rejection came. He thought he had done his research and found schools that fit him. When he visted Colby for acceptance weekend and all the other kids had choices, he felt like he had sold himself short. He hated Colby and felt like he wasn’t being challenged. Luckily he got a 4.0, applyed to a bunch of schools as a transfer (Cornell, Brown, Dartmouth, Penn, Amherst). He ended up choosing Dartmouth, a school he hadn’t even considered initially. He loved Dartmouth. </p>
<p>Yup, applying to schools takes work. Suck it up. If you don’t want to put in a couple extra weekends of work to send in a few extra applications be warned, the next four years could be affected by your decision. Not to mention that these are potentially some of the best four years of your life. I think your advice is meant to be helpful but I equate it to overfeeding your dog out of kindness.</p>