<p>^ Most likely not. The more time you are focusing on miscellaneous things such as that, the less time you have to focus on the actual test.</p>
<p>What did you guys put for the ball that stuck to the surface?</p>
<p>And what did you guys put for the ball with 1.00?</p>
<p>Ball that stuck to the surface: 0
Ball with 1: They most likely threw the ball at the ground, instead of dropping it.</p>
<p>miw140, those were the answers I chose.</p>
<p>I think I did quite well on this section. I was a bit worried since this was my first ACT and I didn’t prep at all for science (I took the SAT three times)</p>
<p>Hmm, this may have been asked before, but I couldn’t find it. </p>
<p>In regards to the titration question where it asked if a particular chemical with PH of 2 could have been the unknown chemical…
choices were:
Yes
Yes
No - because it was less than halfway point.
No - because it was less than equivalence point.</p>
<p>i put equivalence point, say your choice and explain please.</p>
<p>One more Q, there was a debate over like the last question…I got height=amplitude, and width=frequency. I’m pretty sure it was wavelength though…dammit.</p>
<p>rr2022, i’m pretty sure it was height=amplitude and width= wavelength… frequency is how many times something happens in a second, wavelength is the measure of distance between two peaks or two troughs</p>
<p>It was No because it was less than the half way point. The halfway point shows the the pH of the acid added or something like that and the point was above the pH of the acid the person said it was.</p>
<p>For the plant one, there were two questions I am having difficulty remembering. One was asking which type of plants T or something else had more root growth I believe. I remember saying A which was T because more growth on the T plants. Sorry if this is vague but was this right? There was another question also that compared the lengths from the root to the other graph. Anyone know the answer to that one? I think I said for all species the top graph had more growth.</p>
<p>Width was definitely wavelength.</p>
<p>verifying theo’s answer.</p>
<p>It was less than halfway point. I have no clue why, but that’s what October 2011 posters concluded.</p>
<p>SHOOT I think I just found the first question I got wrong. I believe I mixed up heterogenous and homogenous. Nooo</p>
<p>thanks guys. too bad, i put less than equivalence point :(</p>
<p>You could have prevented that by following these legendary rules: “Answer the question exactly as written,” “Never stop questioning,” & “Never assume.”</p>
<p>That’s interesting advice. Where did that come from?</p>
<p>Does anyone know the curve?</p>
<p>Curve must’ve been normal. I think I missed 5-7 questions and I got a 30</p>
<p>Ok. thanks</p>
<p>Why didnt the science test have fighting scientist passage??</p>