<p>^ yes it was “unbelievability of the creature”. I remember that as well. I don’t think that questoin has been discussed yet.</p>
<p>correct on the encyc question as well</p>
<p>Susies-</p>
<p>For your encylcopedia question, i think i said that he gave the examples to show the wide range of topics covered in the encyclopedia.</p>
<p>I can’t really answer your other questions because i keep confusing them with other questions in the same sections and i can’t really remember what exactly the questions were in the first place.</p>
<p>I know that for your squid one, I ultimately decided against the choice that said “to show the creature’s physical strength” but I don’t remember what the better answer was.</p>
<p>For why the mom gave the daughter the map of her heart, I again may be confusing this with another answer to another question, but perhaps it was the answer that was like So that the daughter could better understand her mother’s essence?</p>
<p>oh yeah I agree with Cory and Brownieboy; it was to show how unbelievable the giant squid was.</p>
<p>ya broad range of topics in encyclopedia</p>
<p>I agree with “broad array of topics” for the encyclopedia, as well as “unbelievability” for the squid.</p>
<p>wow…im sorry i just have to annouce this…so far as i’ve been reading over this thread i have not found one CR that i ahve gotten wrong (assuming that pristine/deter and disdainful are correct). YEAAA I BEASTEED IT. sorry. i had to</p>
<p>10 char edit</p>
<p>ok so what would be a math score if you got 2 MC wrong left one blank and got a grid-in wrong?</p>
<p>I’m pessimistically assuming that I messed up 2-3 CR questions, including inaccessible/thwarted. How many questions can I afford to get wrong, historically speaking, for an 800?</p>
<p>is it confirmed that the motorcycle section is NOT experimental?</p>
<p>i had the motorcycle section as my first sections after the essay. I was hoping that that one was experimental, did everyone else have it?</p>
<p>i’m trying to figure out the same thing. But it’s usually 2 i think. Once you get 3 wrong, the dropoff might be down to like a 760/770, since its a difference of 2 raw. (2 wrong = -2, 3 wrong = -4). So i’m hoping i stay at the 2 wrong i’ve counted so far</p>
<p>Motorcycle is not experimental</p>
<p>I’ve counted just 2 wrong as well, thankfully. Besides the stupid rainforest sentence completion, I’ve desperately argued on behalf of the literal, “She was a writer in search of a subject.” (i.e. Why did the author ask her mother as an adult?) It’s not exactly the consensus here, though!</p>
<p>For the “each of which sells,” wouldn’t it be more succinct to say “both sell?”</p>
<p>I mean…to say:</p>
<p>The two stores compete with each other, each of which sells [blah].</p>
<p>is a bit redundant, no?</p>
<p>Sorry for butchering the sentence…I can’t remember it exactly as it was.</p>
<p>the privacy section was the experimental right?</p>
<p>Redundancy < comma splice</p>
<p>I’m pretty sure that “each of which sells” is a superior choice.</p>
<p>ye experimental</p>
<p>if “looking for material as a writer” is wrong, then that’s 3 for me =(. I still think it’s right though…but lets not get into it again lol</p>
<p>Wouldn’t both have a comma splice?</p>
<p>Both answers would have two independent clauses connected with a comma…?</p>
<p>don’t play around with stuff like that cory123. =)</p>
<p>what did we agree on for the rain forest one? inaccessbile or pristine, </p>
<p>i still think pristine does not work in the sentence</p>
<p>i put inaccessible but it looks like most agree it’s pristine. stupid question!</p>