<p>i put “encountered” cuz he didnt just observe it, after meeting it, he took it back with him and stuff. he didnt just observe it, it was… an encounter</p>
<p>sounds like extraterrestrial… an … ENCOUNTER!!! dun dun dun</p>
<p>I put presence because it’s like cheetah’s “noble ____”</p>
<p>second, they just finished talking about making Namibia be aware of the cheetah’s presence by putting it as it’s national animal…etc.</p>
<p>wait…
scary2hairy- so my answer was right?</p>
<p>wat did people put for the 1st question on the painting 2 passage comparison?
it asked which was the difference between the 1st passage and the 2nd passage?</p>
<p>thank you earth-dragon for the explanation</p>
<p>does anyone remember the 2 short passages about the internet boom?
Was the 1st one’s tone more negative?</p>
<p>That one was really easy… It was like, Passage 1 incoroprates two adult views of a painting, and Passage 2 is a child recollection, or something like that</p>
<p>with<em>one</em>voice, nice i got that =]. however, it was based on petty evidence. did it even say that the second passage why by a child recollecting? or was it just implied from looking to grown-ups for courage?</p>
<p>I put “got a hold of” as the best choice for the pepper question. It seems to make more sense to say that someone “got a hold of” a new type of pepper than to say that someone “encountered” a new type of pepper. Also, the paragraph emphasized the power this new pepper brought to merchants, so “got a hold of” seems to fit best.</p>
<p>I think I put encountered.
I’m not sure it’s really the right word, but “got a hold of” didn’t sound very SATish…</p>
<p>hey for the noble_, i put demeanor,
in the beginning of the passage, they were talking about how graceful the cheetah is
and the answer i put that asks the difference betw the 2 passages is like" one is from a more analytical view point, the other is from a child view point"</p>
<p>what is the question for bearing</p>
<p>and what are the chioces</p>
<p>demeanor, or presence</p>
<p>PLEASE answer to my question…</p>
<p>Do you guyz remember the question with two short passages that dealt with science? Passage 1 was mainly about science and passage 2 was about a person blah blah blah…</p>
<p>Anyways, the second question was like
“How does the [the person’s name] respond to lines [something] in passage 1?”
a) agree with evidence support
b) agree blah blah blah
c) agree blah blah blah
d) disagree blah blah blah
e) disagree blah blah blah</p>
<p>What did you guyz put? I think I put either a) or d) but I don’t really remember… guyz HELP!!!</p>
<p>disagree, that’s the scientist that said anything spiritual is unscientific or something like dat</p>
<p>yah, Vinny on the A…B…100 question it didn’t specify integer, odd, or anything. I remembered to check for that after I answered “II” only, but I got lucky when I re-read it and the question didn’t specify.</p>
<p>Does anybody remember the critical reading question about the little girl? It had something to do with her being ____ inside and then going outside and becoming intractable again. I think I narrowed down the answer choices in the blank to taciturn and docile, I chose taciturn because I couldn’t remember what intractable meant. Anybody else remember this question? What did you guys put?</p>
<p>I think it should have been Docile.</p>
<p>This was disscussed several times so you might want to look for it.</p>
<p>Docile is the exact opposite of intractable … and hence the right answer.</p>
<p>What’s the difference between docile and taciturn?</p>
<p>Also - in the maths what does it mean when they put two vertical lines around an equation (each | x-2 | or something)? Are they like brackets or… never seen those things before in my life.</p>
<p>the lines signify absolute value, so after you solve everything inside, make your answer positive if it’s not and don’t do anything to it if it is.
I am very disturbed that you’ve never seen that before - what grade are you in?</p>