Still confused about UC fine arts requirement
I am finally caught up on the thread and wanted to follow up on a couple of posts by @Ynotgo and @CT1417 from a few days ago (about UC course requirements).
As an out-of-stater, I have been struggling to figure out the UC (and Cal State) requirements for a few months now, and am still confused (particularly about the fine arts piece). DS has not taken any type of art or music in high school (he quit band and chorus after three years of each in middle school to make room to pursue other interests).
When reading about requirements on various UC websites this past spring, I came across something called “admission by exam.” As I understand it, this provides a formula you can use to calculate an index score of sorts based on SAT/ACT tests. The website provides cutoffs for in-state and out-of-state students (more stringent for out-of-state), such that if you score above the cutoff your application will be considered even if you don’t meet their minimum entry requirements. I won’t know for certain if DS meets the cutoff until his SATII scores come back in July, but am 99% sure he will (based on ACT scores). As I understand it, “admission by exam” doesn’t mean the student gets automatically admitted, just that their application will be considered. (And I recognize that a school like Berkeley is still a long shot).
I even called someone a few months ago (can’t recall now if it was someone at Santa Cruz, or a more general UC admissions person) to inquire about this “admission by exam” policy, and she confirmed my understanding. But she also said that it would be “easier” to just take a community college class to meet the fine art requirement. At the time, I assumed she meant it would be hard to score high enough to qualify this way, but I figured that for a kid who already has the scores, it would be “easier” to use the scores than to take a whole extra class. In light of @ynotgo’s comment (not worth applying to UC schools without a fine art credit), I am second guessing the plan to rely on test scores in lieu of a fine arts class. (Maybe the admissions person really meant he’d have an “easier” time getting accepted if he had taken a fine arts class?)
Meanwhile, DS and DH are coincidentally on a tour of California colleges this week. They visited UCSC and UCB (both of which DS really liked). They specifically asked about the fine art requirement and the “admission by exam” exception during both visits. The admissions people they spoke to did not seem to know anything about “admission by exam” but also encouraged DS to apply without the fine art, explaining that they understand that OOS students may have slightly different high school preparation than students from CA (DH reported that the sense of encouragement was stronger at UCB, whereas UCSC seemed more confused by the whole question, but both said there is a place on the application to explain situations like this; I’m guessing UCB gets more OOS applications than UCSC). Also, given @ynotgo’s comment that California schools don’t actually require fine arts for graduation, the UCB person’s attitude toward OOS applicants seems a bit surprising (though I assume college-bound California students are likely to be advised of the UC college entry requirements at least, and they probably realize that OOS students won’t all have this information).
I am confused as to why UC lists this “admission by exam” policy on their website if the ad comms at their various campuses don’t know anything about it. Also, I wonder why UCB and UCSC would say it’s OK to apply without fine arts if that’s really not the case. I’ve heard that the UC system is “opaque” in their admissions policies, but I’m still surprised at how much contradictory information I’ve been getting. I’m seriously confused, and can’t tell if it’s worth the application fee for DS to apply to these schools.
Any information from people in the know about UC requirements would be greatly appreciated!