<p>I do not care much what those celebrities do and why. the reason is very well known as much as other will disagree, I will never change my opinion about that. The reason is to jack the ratings up. Negative talks do more than positive sugary comments and they are aware of the fact. What is totally dislike though that Paula overshadowed something else in the current talks about our liberties. Whatever Paula said, including her apologizing is sooo unimportant primarily because of the underlining reason why it all happened. But it got into much more important status because all of a suddent she is a big enemy of the liberties and NOT the real enemy - IRS. Nobody cares…but I do and that is why I am not happy with Paula, she gave a reason for the media to switch the topic and she is by far not the only one. Media grabs them all and drops important stuff, while mst do not care to begin with…</p>
<p>Regarding her breakfast sandwich, the biggest problem for a diabetic is the donut. The meat and eggs are fine. (Of course, the calorie count is probably not ideal either.)</p>
<p>It is to the advantage of Novo Nordisk and all other diabetes drug makers if T2 diabetics DO NOT control their blood glucose with diet and exercise, and if T1 diabetics use more insulin. If T2s do, they are less likely to need to take drugs. If T1s do, they will probably be able to use less insulin. Look at the list of major donors to the ADA. Drug companies and food companies that push carbs. Lobbying for the Food Pyramid, lobbying the ADA, all part and parcel of the same thing.</p>
<p>Paula Deen is perfect for them: the idea that one can make some small changes and pop a pill is a LOT more appealing than having to truly restrict carbs. </p>
<p>The more I read about Paula Deen and her brother, the less likely I am to believe that she is getting a raw deal. :(</p>
<p>
I read the 4th paragraph, but do we know for sure that she actually said that in 2007? I am by no means a fan of Paula Deen, but I’m hesitant to get on the band wagon to make someone pay for something they said years ago.</p>
<p>So my question is, do we know for sure that she said this in 2007, or is it just something she has been accused of? My understanding is the trial isn’t over, and it seems unfair to convict her publicly before the jury weighs in.</p>
<p>People in the public eye are called to a higher standard… especially when they are being paid big bucks to represent a certain ‘brand’. I do not know, but seems unlikely this was a one time offense as so many refer to a singular use of the ‘N’ word. PD certainly dodged that specific question in the interview I heard yesterday morning. It’s horribly abusive, and does tremendous damage… Not saying I agree with the course of events … Thank you to the posters that have posted on the actual facts of the case without emotion… It encourages me to go read the actual paper… Wherever this ends, her image is tarnished forever.</p>
<p>I wish all the Paula Deen drones and ill-educated teenagers would stop asserting the false observation that African Americans in the main approve of the vile word. Plenty of folks, prominent and ordinary, and not just Black preachers, ROUTINELY express their frustration with the currency that the insulting word has today. Convict Rappers and Hip-hoppers don’t speak for them.</p>
<p>And the Deen Drones should stop with the weak defense of “…it was years ago.” Most Black folks realize that a lot of White folks, especially Southerners, spoke the word, frequently or not, in days gone by. To clear-headed African Americans, the thinking is “what have you done lately?” I mean really, being a former segregationist didn’t end the public careers of either George Wallace or Jerry Falwell, both of whom had Black supporters once they renounced racism. Hell, do I even need to mention that truly tragic figure Strom Thurmond? He never even renounced his segregationist past. But he picked up quite a few Black votes during his last 40 years in the U.S. Senate.</p>
<p>
I don’t care what it once was. It’s about the current meaning.</p>
<p>I tell you, I am shocked, just shocked that a southern woman of this generation could use such language…what a surprise. And the other stunner was to find out that someone with an unhealthy lifestyle who is overweight and eats poorly, could develop diabetes. I mean, unless these Paula Deen scandals had come out, who would have known?</p>
<p>I say, destroy her, cut her down! Burn the witch!</p>
<p>
And fire all her employees. Especially the black ones because they shouldn’t be subjected to her and I’m sure there are plenty of other food service jobs available because no one else wants them, right? Oh wait . . .</p>
<p>This is why I find television personalities useless. When it turns sour, it hits the fan.</p>
<p>If I wanted to try new food, I’d look to the web for interesting high-rated recipes.
Amen</p>
<p>I am not a Paula Deen fan at all either. I think the media is on a witch hunt and I don’t care what she did. I am have said the ****** word before and I don’t give a rats butt who cares. I have never said it to a person though. I have a few choice words for white people I don’t like too. I am just all race hater. </p>
<p>I am sure we will see more from Paula Deen. Too many people love her and many believe she is getting a raw deal.</p>
<p>You know, maybe she was wrong, maybe she IS racist, maybe she made a few bucks on unhealthy food, maybe this, maybe that. (Or not.) But wow, just look at how folks here are jumping on her, letting it all hang out, no holds barred. </p>
<p>RHH, if someone outside your friend and peer group referred to you as an “F,” would you be ok with that? Or, if there was some person you particularly admire for savvy, accomplishments, compassion, the leadership role, etc, would you be ok hearing a stranger call him or her a “F?” If someone generalized and referred to all gays as “Fs” with disrespect, it is ok?</p>
<p>I think we’re excusing the word based on who says it. If it’s only ok for an in-group to use, that already suggests some know it’s a dicey choice.</p>
<p>I do wonder if strong women are an inviting target for some. Thought this when Martha Stewart was being vilified. Hilary Clinton went through it. We can name others.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>I really don’t think you need to wonder… </p>
<p>I personally think she’s getting a raw deal and I can’t stand the woman. I also know that there are words I was raised around that I’ve said that in no way reflect what I actually think. Language is imprinted on your mind and it’s very, very difficult to get around how your brain is wired. I much prefer to judge people by their actions than their words.</p>
<p>
Then your point is in no relation to my original post.</p>
<p>I can get past her use of a particular word if it was as simple as a bad choice. If the use of a particular word was the only issue than I would feel it is a witch hunt and folks are looking to hang her out to dry. As a business owner with employees I find her alleged choice of words, phrases, and actions in the work setting to be degrading and disgusting. I am incredibly troubled by the work environment issues!</p>
<p>In a sense, the witch hunt is part of the purpose of television personalities. People need a villain just as much as they need a hero. What better object than a charismatic celebrity whose ethics were already in question?</p>
<p>To those who sympathize with Deen, consider the controversy a hazard of her occupation. To those who vilify her, continue to enjoy the product of Scripps Networks Interactive, Inc. and Tribune Company.</p>
<p>“I do wonder if strong women are an inviting target for some. Thought this when Martha Stewart was being vilified. Hilary Clinton went through it.”</p>
<p>People enjoy watching the demise of a strong woman. The two you named were prime examples of women who people truly enjoyed attacking. I didn’t like either of them much before, but after the attacks I felt far more sympathetic towards them.</p>
<p>It always makes me laugh when the people who promote something are blamed when someone uses it. I agree with the person who posted about traditional southern cooking. meant to be enjoyed occasionally. But no one is holding a gun to your head and making you eat her recipes. She never said they were healthy. She said they tasted good. it doesn’t take a rocket scientist to know the food isnt good for you. My H and I were talking about making a short run to the grocery store and paying 80.00 dollars for a few bags. I said eating healthy is expensive , its the crappy food that isn’t. That is a major contributor to obesity, people simply cant afford healthy food. This bothers me.
I know my family does not use the N word. I have lived in the south and never used it. I have heard it, but in the people I have associated with it is not common. I wonder if AA think we use it all the time, or maybe I live in a bubble. My town is diverse and it just isn’t even thought of.
It is difficult to walk in someone else’s shoes, I never understood the whole race issue until I saw the movie Mississippi Burning. Then I said I am starting to understand. I leave it to AA to determine the use of that word. I don’t want my kids using it or anyone else in my home. I consider it a harmful word. the word simply has different connotations depending on who uses it, a fact in our current society.
I always just thought of Pauls Deen as a person with no filter, she doesn’t seem to understand how she sounds. I think the way she talked was part of her attraction to some folks. Anyway she should be fine she is already richer than most of us will ever be.</p>
<p>I just watched the Today Show interview online. Matt Lauer came across as an ass. I know contemporary media is all about canned questions and trying to embarrass a target, but really! Was Deen a bit melodramatic in her defense? Probably, but the media gets no points from me on their “reporting” of this matter.</p>
<p>Is Matt Lauer “news media”?</p>
<p>In the meantime… :o
[Paula</a> Deen cookbook surges to No. 1 on Amazon amid controversy - TODAY.com](<a href=“http://www.today.com/food/paula-deen-cookbook-surges-no-1-amazon-amid-controversy-6C10468611]Paula”>Paula Deen cookbook surges to No. 1 on Amazon amid controversy)</p>