<p>This is a sensitive issues with lots of different opinions and angles. I am inclined to agree with ScottZ1980 (post #11), with one slight twist. Our society tends to reward outcome more than effort. I would encourage both. Some people have stronger internal drive/motivation, and others prefer external rewards. Neither is right or wrong-- they are just different styles. Acknowledging and rewarding effort, even if the outcome isn’t as superb as we’d like, will encourge the person to keep trying. Effort usually leads to a good outcome eventually-- we just have to shape up the behavior a bit.</p>
<p>Ther is something called the Premack Principle in psychology-- complete the lesser desired actvity for the opportunity to do the greater desired activity (ie clean up your room and then you can go to the concert). People do this all the time. It is a reward. Money is a reward. The other plattitude I use is that our vocation provides us with the funds to pursue our avocation (ie work to earn $$ to pursue hobbies). Hopefully people work in an area they enjoy, but they also have greater passions outside the workplace. To teach someone to be successful in part by rewarding both effort and outcome, so as to eventually earn $$ to pursue their dreams is fine by me. </p>
<p>Teriwtt- Thanks for finding that article. I am off to read today’s Atlanta paper to find the full article. I am disturbed by the comments of the GA State professor. Statements like this
are simply absurd, and make me embarassed to live in the same state as this professor. He may teach in the Educational Policy Dept. but he has a lot to learn about other aspects of education. Simply put, I think that being creative-- coming up with extrinsic motivators to stay in school and get an education is worth it. Without the education these students will be in minimum wage jobs, un- or under-employed, or possibly finding alternative sources of legal or illegal income. And this line
Is this supposed to be a BAD thing?? Good grief.</p>