Please help me evaluate if I should ED to Dartmouth [CA resident, 3.1 GPA, 1510 SAT]

The discussion here seems to presume that a PG year has no value other than the admissions advantage it would provide, which (as others have stated) would likely still not be enough for Dartmouth. I wouldn’t assume, however, that such an experience would have no value in itself. The option of a PG year abroad can be a wonderful experience too; it doesn’t bring with it the expertise of prep school admissions counselors, but it would still allow OP to apply with another year of strong grades and the additional rigor of the courses taken abroad as well as the broadening experience of immersion in another culture. I wouldn’t do it just for admissions advantage, but that wouldn’t be the only reason to value such a once-in-a-lifetime experience. It depends what kinds of experiences the OP would value.

I agree with MYOS that while CCC-UC would work very well, it might not be an option the OP and his family are willing to consider. Another route that could work similarly, while providing a residential college experience from day one, would be Richard Bland College in VA, which is a residential two-year school that is a division of William & Mary. Seamless transfer to W&M or UVA would be guaranteed with the requisite GPA, and there’s a Bridge Program that allows RBC students to take W&M classes prior to transfer. Both W&M and UVA are fantastic schools for econ/finance.

6 Likes

I haven’t commented on this thread, but I have been following along. I’m not going to address the topic of what you should do next school year. I will, however, talk about how I tend to chance students and what kind of schools I think you might have your best shot for.

When chancing a student, I tend to sort schools into these categories:

  • Extremely Likely (80-99+%)
  • Likely (60-79%)
  • Toss-Up (40-59%)
  • Lower Probability (20-39%)
  • Low Probability (less than 20%)

I first look at a school’s admission rate. If the admissions rate is below 20%, then it almost always will stay in the low probability category, no matter how amazing the student’s record, simply because the vast majority of awesome applicants are denied at these schools.

If a school accepts less than half of its applicants, GPA will tend to play a bigger role. If a student has below a 3.5 GPA, then it’s important to look at the Common Data Set in terms of the relative importance of factors in admission (C7) and C11 which shows the breakdown of the GPAs.

I looked up Bryant (well known for its business programs) on the College Board’s website. On the admissions tab, it shared this GPA info which typically pulls from C11 (source). The fact that 15% of the students it accepted had a GPA below your GPA range, is GREAT news for you.

image: Snip showing GPA range of 3.75+ is 30%, 3.50-3.74 is 21%, 3.25-3.49 is 19%, 3.00-3.24 is 15%, 2.50-2.99 is 14%, 2.00-2.49 is 1%, below 2.0 is 0%, from https://bigfuture.collegeboard.org/colleges/bryant-university/admissions

If a school accepts 25% or fewer of its applicants in or below a student’s GPA, then I will drop that school down one category of likelihood (i.e. from a likely to a toss-up). If a school accepts 10% or fewer of its applicants in or below a student’s GPA, then I will drop that school down two categories of likelihood (i.e. from a likely to a lower probability). If a school accepts less than 5% of its applicants in or below a student’s GPA, and they are not a recruited athlete or have a Nobel or Oscar, then I would probably drop the applicant’s likelihood down by three categories (i.e. from a likely to low probability).

Neither Dartmouth nor Bentey completed the GPA sections, but both schools completed C7.

For Dartmouth, all academic components (rigor, class rank, GPA, test scores) are considered very important (Dartmouth’s SY23-24 CDS). GPA being marked as very important is not good for you.

At Bentley, rigor is very important, GPA is important, and standardized test scores are considered (Bentley’s SY23-24 CDS). The fact that rigor is very important (moreso than GPA) will benefit you, but the fact that GPA is more important than standardized test scores will not.

image: Section C7 of Bentley's Common Data Set showing that rigor is very important, Academic GPA is important, and Standardized test scores are considered..

But right now you might be saying, “What about my SAT score?”

If a student’s test scores are above the 75th percentile for a school, then I will usually bump the school up one category in terms of likelihood. If it is WAY above the 75th percentile (like 150-200+ points), then I would move it up two categories. The same thing happens in reverse if a score is below the 25th percentile.

GPA can move a students chances further down (3 levels) than a way above average for the school’s tests can move it up (2 levels). Why? If a school makes a distinction between GPA and test scores in importance, GPA will almost always be more important.

Your test score is competitive to get into a school with a sub-20% acceptance rate. But the other aspects of your application will be decreasing your odds significantly as compared to the rest of the applicant pool at these schools with very low admission rates.

For most of the schools with an admissions rate below 50%, your GPA will probably bring you down 2-3 levels in terms of chances. Your SAT score will probably only pull you up 1 level, maybe 2 (depending on the school). So most schools that have an acceptance rate of 40-60% will probably be either a low or lower probability school for you. Schools with an acceptance rate of 20-40% will be no more than a low probability. Schools with an acceptance rate below 20% would be extremely improbable to receive an acceptance.

I have more to say, but I’ll separate it into a separate post.

8 Likes

I’m not the biggest fan of ED and using it strategically, but it might make sense for you if you find a school that you would be happy to enroll in. ED acceptance rates may appear artificially high since most athletes, which can be a significant percentage of students at a small school, come through ED when they were already pre-approved. But there are schools where ED provides a definite boost.

Below is a table showing the ED admission rate and the regular admission rates, pulled from this aggregator. I will readily admit that the Allegheny numbers look suspect, and it’s always best to verify any information with a school’s own data/Common Data Set. But for a quick initial look, aggregators can be useful tools.

This list includes the schools that @prezbucky suggested as well as some that a poster with knowledge of finance has suggested as schools that punch above their weight for moving students into financial fields.

School ED Admission Rate Regular Admission Rate (Excluding EA & ED) Admission Rate (Freshman Overall)
Ithaca 94% 62% 75%
Providence 87% 36% 53%
Fairfield 83% 43% 52%
Bryant 82% 50% 69%
Wheaton (MA) 82% 73% 80%
College of the Holy Cross 81% 33% 36%
Bentley 78% 57% 58%
Hobart & William Smith 74% 59% 68%
St. Lawrence 73% 63% 63%
Fordham 67% 51% 54%
Bucknell 58% 30% 33%
Franklin & Marshall 58% 35% 36%
Trinity College 54% 36% 36%
Lafayette 43% 33% 34%
Colby 42% 8% 8%
Babson 38% 18% 22%
Allegheny 38% 50% 64%
Union 33% 21% 22%
Colgate 25% 11% 12%
Dartmouth 21% 5% 6%

Looking at this data, it appears that Fairfield and College of the Holy Cross give a significant bump for ED. Bentley’s percentage difference in acceptance likelihood (between ED and RD) might be another school that could move from an iffy possibility to a likelier one for you. By no means would I consider any of these schools “likely” admits for you, but they might be a toss-up or lower probability school for you as an ED school, vs a low or very low probability school in RD.

I think this is a great suggestion.

7 Likes

With the obvious caveat that I don’t know OP or OP’s family, as an East-coast native who has been living in the SF Bay Area for 25+ years, I can say that it appears much more common for students (even those from families with plenty of resources) to take the CC-to-UC path than it is for students here to go to a PG year, or for East Coast students with similar finances to go to community college. I’m sure prestige plays a factor for some families - but it’s just much more common to start at CC in CA.

4 Likes

I wouldn’t disagree with that, but maybe worth pointing out that OP was asking about chances in ED to Dartmouth, not about whether they should do another year of school.

3 Likes

Yep, so I don’t know what posters consider “upper class” but we Iive in a suburb generally considered wealthy in the Bay Area (but not Palo Alto/atherton property prices). Our public high school is well regarded (again, not quite Gunn, but it does well with top schools). On average, 96% of our school’s graduates go on to 4-year colleges. Almost all of the rest do the cc-uc route, often with significant success in ending up at one of the “better” UCs (and occasionally not getting beyond an associates degree). This route is often due to disappointment with outcomes for where their kids have been accepted to - I know of a few in my D19’s class who went this route even with some 4-year college acceptances - and believing they could end up somewhere “better”. A family member of mine on the east coast however would not consider CC after a disappointing college round - she went to her state flagship (bing) and transferred into a T20 from sophomore year. While there may be advantages to a PG year, I can’t help thinking a transfer -whether from cc or another college - is probably generally going to give you a better chance than another year of high school.

2 Likes

If you read back, you can see where which I originally mentioned this possibility only briefly, in the context of advice he might (or might not) get from a private counselor. I have revisited it now only because it blossomed into a whole discussion within which assertions were made that I felt needed to be balanced.

I responded to OP’s original question already. I think Dartmouth is a waste of an ED app, but if OP has no more realistic school he’d be willing to ED to, then he wouldn’t be sacrificing anything by taking his shot; I just don’t think it’ll be fruitful.

5 Likes

A state flagship is a “disappointing” college admissions result?

1 Like

I would take a close look at the schools @prezbucky recommended, as I think many of them match up with what you say appealed to you about Dartmouth. Since you were thinking about Boston College, however, it doesn’t seem as though a rural location is a necessity.

I was going to try and suggest a number of schools for you that were likelier admits, but your situation is more involved and I don’t have the time to do so. So I will walk you through how I would chance you for one school on the list above.

I’m looking at Union College (NY). Here is its SY23-24 Common Data Set. College Navigator can also be used for looking up some admissions info (like admissions rate, including by sex, if you don’t feel like taking the time to do the calculations from the CDS yourself). College Navigator - Union College

44% of students were admitted, placing it in the Toss-Up category.

Section C7 lists rigor, class rank, and GPA as very important (mostly not good news), but standardized test scores and the essay are still considered important (good news…it’s not just “considered”). I’m going to make sure to look at all the “very important” areas on the CDS.

Aditionally, ECs and talent/ability are considered important which is higher than many. This could be a place where your rowing might be to your advantage, if you’re interested in continuing to row and you would be an appropriate candidate for their team.

Taking a look at section C9 (testing data), no more than 49% of students submitted a test and you’re above the 75th percentile by 50 points. This would move Union up one category (from a toss-up to a likely for you). Because nearly half of students submitted a test score, one might even suppose that they like test scores and that this could be a strong level up bump (i.e. not just barely scooting up one level but solidly placing in the next level).
image

Class rank was mentioned as very important, and with a 3.1 UW GPA from a high income family, I’m guessing that you’re in the bottom 50% of your high school class.

Looking at the CDS, more than 95% was in the top of the class, but only about a third of students submitted their class rank. If more students had submitted a rank, then I think this could have moved you down a category, but because so few did I think it nudges you downard in your current category (likely) but doesn’t take you down a full level.

Then we look at GPA.
image

11.7% of students who reported a test score have your GPA range or lower but 17.6% of the students overall had your GPA range or below. This moves you down at least one category (i.e. back to a toss-up) since fewer than 25% of students were in your range or lower.

Union also shared its average high school GPA, but it did so as a percentage (common in New York) rather than on a 4.0 scale.
image

Using this College Board GPA conversion table, the 91% equates to about a 3.7 GPA as its average GPA.

So, having done all of this and considered your ECs, I’d probably say that Union would be a toss-up for you, but leaning to the lower end of the category (as the rank being V. Important would be pushing you downward and the V. Important categories (outside of rigor) are all pushing the category down).

Going through this process for any schools under consideration might help you to create a balanced list of schools to apply to. You want to make sure you have at least one option (and preferably more than one) where you are extremely likely to be admitted, that your family is willing and able to afford, and that you would be happy to enroll in and attend for the full program length (i.e. 4 years for college or 2 years for community college).

Mind you, I am not an admissions professional, but this process might be helpful in trying to gauge your own chances at schools.

4 Likes

One that isn’t a “public ivy” for a student who was aiming at T20, yes. Her subjective opinion- not my judgement.

Hi! My son is also interested in Dartmouth ED. He, too, is from CA and a rower who doesn’t have a super clear shot but also fell in love with the school. It’s so hard to tell if you or he will get in, isn’t it? I commend you for posting and for being able to handle all of this feedback during such an incredibly stressful time for you seniors. I wonder if you’ve reached out to a Dartmouth student? They encourage this as a “next step” on their website. Katherine W is the one who gave us a tour this summer. She was really approachable and unassuming and she works for the admissions office which means that she may be someone who can give you insight. Dartmouth Connect www.admissions.dartmouth.edu/visit/connect I think you are doing great and that you’ve got this! You will figure out which school is best for you to use your ED card with, no problem. You still have time.

2 Likes

agree with all you wrote here and above. agree, especially, with looking for a Dartmouth-like alternative and that Colgate checks that box. unfortunately, I think Colgate is just as unlikely an admit as Dartmouth. Dartmouth is harder, but there are no degrees of “no”; it’s just no, and I don’t see Colgate as the school that’s going to take a flier. There are some selectives that do reach down in the pool for a compellingly interesting kid, but I don’t think Colgate is one of them. There is a little more uniformity there.

Hobart & William Smith maybe?

I really counsel against using the ED card on such a long shot. It’s a waste IMO.

3 Likes

This is a long shot, but I’d ask if you are sure you’re not recruiting material.

Dartmouth is D1, so you probably would know by now. But is there a chance you could get your 2K erg time down to get Dartmouth’s attention? Though Dartmouth is D1, they’re not Yale or Brown in that sport and it’s relatively easier to be recruited there for that sport. If there is a 3.1 GPA admit at Dartmouth, I can almost guarantee you it’s a highly prized athletic recruit.

If not D1 and Dartmouth, perhaps get your 2K down to a level that would grab the attention of a D3 target school.

Athletic recruiting is IMO the most powerful hook this side of being a Firestone family member applying to Princeton. If you’re not a super important legacy, athlete is the next best thing.

OP hasn’t been back for over a month.

1 Like

Sorry. Missed that.

1 Like

lol I knew one of those and they were also a recruit :rofl: never heard of a more 100% admit ever

2 Likes