<p>" It’s not clear from the OP as to whether time (work) was needed to generate wealth or if wealth was assumed. The latter would provide time for money in addition to having the choice as to whether or not to work and that can make the difference in whether work is fun or not. I enjoy my job but it is comforting to know that I could take a few years off and live off of savings even though I feel that I would be less happy not working for an extended period of time."</p>
<p>In my case, I worked because I liked to work. I was a college professor on tenure track, and I was at a university at which professors had to teach more courses per semester than they do at many other universities. I also had the good fortune to get a fellowship that allowed me to travel around the world while still working as a university professor. </p>
<p>In becoming a college prof, I already had taken myself out of a Fortune 500 job in which I was slated to have become an assistant VP of the corporation. That job would have required lots of travel and would have allowed me no life --not even a family life – so I had opted for a different type of employment at a much lower level of compensation.</p>
<p>Work, family, fellowship were the components of my life. I loved all of those components, but I due to the lack of women in my workplace and the fact that I was in a new city, I didn’t have an opportunity to make close female friends until years later after I didn’t get tenure. After not finding employment, I became active in a variety of community activities where I was able to meet women who became close friends.</p>
<p>" I have friends who are currently very stressed out with their lack of wealth so I may be biased. </p>
<p>One of them had her family income cut from $60,000 to $30,000. Her husband was almost laid off last year and count himself lucky to be the last 4 of the employee left. He worked there since he was 14. My friend told me they were just informed there will be a 20%. She is trying to grow food in her backyard. "</p>
<p>I wouldn’t call those examples a “lack of wealth”. Those people lack the money to provide food and shelter. I don’t think that’s what the article was referring to.</p>
<p>I think the article was referring to people who may have 3 BMWs, a large sailboat, a 5,000 square foot house and a vacation summer home for 3-person family. To pay for all of those material things, the parents may be each working 60 hours a week in high stress, high prestige jobs that they don’t enjoy. They may not have time and energy for friends, they may be neglecting their health, and they may not be happy. They also may have high credit card debt because they tried to buy happiness.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, who may be happy is the 3-person, 1-car family living in a 1,200 square foot house that they’re paying for with jobs that they work 40 hours a week, leaving them plenty of time to enjoy friends and good health. I know people like this who seem to get more enjoyment out of things like weekly potlucks and occasional camping trips with family/friends than higher paid people get on their luxury vacations.</p>