For a Cal State with a Pacific Northwest-adjacent climate and a very LGBTQ+ friendly culture, I’d add Cal Poly Humboldt to the list.
There are a lot of assumptions built into this post. First of all, while it’s certainly fine to have an interest in law, law school is a huge commitment both effort-wise and expense-wise, and a rising junior who has yet to take her first AP or honors class is a long way from making this decision. A law degree is not the guaranteed ticket to lucrative employment that it once was, and a lot of people in the field are giving advice like, “If you can’t attend a T15 law school, don’t even bother.” I’m definitely not looking to start a debate on that point - a lot depends on the individual’s circumstances, interests, and goals - but I’d definitely say that’s it’s way too early to portray law school as the “plan of record” - at most it should be one option among several. There are other social-sciency grad school options like public health and public policy, among others, which can open up rewarding career paths. A 16y/o probably isn’t aware of the full range of possibilities.
Vis-a-vis law, I’d also be assessing how she does with standardized testing over the next few years. True, standardized tests have suddenly begun to matter much less for CA students aiming for in-state public U’s… but testing well is still a big deal for anyone considering law. You need to perform well on the LSAT to get in, and then you need to pass the Bar Exam after spending all that time and money in law school. It’s an uphill battle for students who don’t test well, so that’s something to keep in mind.
I’m also moved to pose a semi-rhetorical question about the issue of budget and “fairness.” I’m wondering whether your son chose the CC-to-UC route because of cost constraints (in which case it makes perfect sense that the same constraints would apply with your daughter) or if he went to CC for other reasons (wanting a UC and not having a strong enough record to apply as a freshman, not wanting to leave home yet, etc.) What if your son could have gotten into Davis as a freshman; would this then have set the budget bar at the cost of UC for 4 years? I understand cost parity between kids as one aspect of fairness, but it’s not the only aspect. If the budget was the budget, all along, then fair enough; but I’m not sure the goal posts should move just because the first child took a less expensive path. This is all your private business and you’re not obliged to explain, but the way you have framed the budget around “fairness” rather than around what is actually affordable for your family is a bit confusing to me.
Schools to look at in Oregon: Southern Oregon U in Ashland is a WUE public with a somewhat private-LAC-like ambience; it’s extremely LBGT-friendly as you might expect from a school where a lot of students are attracted by the theatre programs. A private U where she might get enough merit (impossible to project at this stage of course) is Willamette U in Salem. Willamette has a law school and offers an accelerated 3+3 law program, which would save a year of undergrad costs. It’s situated right in the state capital and many students are politically engaged and get internships in state government and adjacent organizations. It’s not as artsy-liberal as SOU but it’s certainly LGBT-friendly and a great place for social-sciency students.
A lot of people assume that Utah would be a bad destination for an LGBTQ+ student, but that’s not necessarily the case at UofU. It made the news 10 years ago for making Campus Pride’s Top 25. Salt Lake is a pretty progressive city. Also, Utah allows OOS students a path to residency after the first year, which can save a lot of money in year 2-4.